Literature DB >> 17297133

Voluntary waiting period and adoption of synchronized breeding in dairy herd improvement herds.

R H Miller1, H D Norman, M T Kuhn, J S Clay, J L Hutchison.   

Abstract

Voluntary waiting period and adoption of synchronized breeding (ovulation synchronization followed by timed artificial insemination) were characterized from 33 million services of Holsteins and Jerseys in Dairy Herd Improvement herds. Calving month, calving year, and parity had large effects on days to first service for both breeds. Holstein cows that calved during March and April were bred later than those that calved during other months (February and March for Jerseys), whereas cows that calved during September and October were bred earlier. First-parity cows had longer days to first service than did second-parity cows. Herd-year voluntary waiting period was measured as the days postpartum by which 10% of cows had received a first insemination. Median days to reach 10% of cows bred were 55.5 d. Over 65% of herds had 10% of cows inseminated by 60 d postpartum, the voluntary waiting period assumed for national evaluations for daughter pregnancy rate. Herd-years with synchronized breeding at first insemination were identified through chi2 analysis based on deviation of observed frequency of first inseminations by day of the week from an expected equal frequency and by the maximum percentage of cows inseminated on a particular day of the week. Herds that were identified as having synchronized breeding had fewer days to first service (17.0), more services (0.16/cow), and fewer days open (9.1) than did herds that were classified as having traditional estrus detection. Synchronized herds also had a standard deviation for days to first service that was only 38% as large as that for herds that bred on observed estrus. Adoption of synchronized breeding for first services steadily increased from 1.9% of herd-years (2% of cows) for 1996 to 19.9% of herd-years (34.9% of cows) for 2005. Procedures for genetic evaluation of daughter pregnancy rate should be examined to determine if herd regimen for reproductive management affects results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17297133     DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(07)71645-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  3 in total

1.  Evaluation of two dairy herd reproductive performance indicators that are adjusted for voluntary waiting period.

Authors:  Emma Löf; Hans Gustafsson; Ulf Emanuelson
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 1.695

2.  Reproductive Performance in a Selected Sample of Dairy Farms in Una-Sana Canton, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Authors:  Adis Softic; Adam Dunstan Martin; Eystein Skjerve; Nihad Fejzic; Teufik Goletic; Aida Kustura; Erik Georg Granquist
Journal:  Vet Med Int       Date:  2020-03-16

3.  The vaginal and uterine blood flow changes during the ovsynch program and its impact on the pregnancy rates in Holstein dairy cows.

Authors:  Heba A Sharawy; AbdelRaouf O Hegab; Engy F Risha; Mohamed El-Adl; Walid T Soliman; Mohamed A Gohar; Reham A Fahmy; Virginia M Farag; Kazuhiko Imakawa; Fuller W Bazer; Daniela James; Adel Zaghloul; Abdelnasser A Abdalla; Mariam M Rabie; Mohammed A Elmetwally
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2022-09-17       Impact factor: 2.792

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.