Literature DB >> 17296659

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for non-small cell lung cancer staging: A systematic review and metaanalysis.

Carlos G Micames1, Douglas C McCrory, Darren A Pavey, Paul S Jowell, Frank G Gress.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is a minimally invasive alternative technique for mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer. A metaanalysis was performed to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA for staging mediastinal lymph nodes (N2/N3 disease) in patients with lung cancer.
METHODS: Relevant studies were identified using Medline (1966 to November 2005), CINAHL, and citation indexing. Included studies used histology or adequate clinical follow-up (> 6 months) as the "gold standard," and provided sufficient data for calculating sensitivity and specificity. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves metaanalysis was performed to estimate the pooled sensitivity and specificity.
RESULTS: In 18 eligible studies, EUS-FNA identified 83% of patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 78 to 87%) with positive mediastinal lymph nodes (pooled sensitivity) and 97% of patients (95% CI, 96 to 98%) with negative mediastinal lymph nodes (pooled specificity). In eight studies that were limited to patients who had abnormal mediastinal lymph nodes seen on CT scans, the sensitivity was 90% (95% CI, 84 to 94%) and the specificity was 97% (95% CI, 95 to 98%). In patients without abnormal mediastinal lymph nodes seen on CT scans (four studies), the pooled sensitivity was 58% (95% CI, 39 to 75%). Minor complications were reported in 10 cases (0.8%). There were no major complications.
CONCLUSIONS: EUS-FNA is a safe modality for the invasive staging of lung cancer that is highly sensitive when used to confirm metastasis to mediastinal lymph nodes seen on CT scans. In addition, among lung cancer patients with normal mediastinal adenopathy seen on CT scans, despite lower sensitivity, it has the potential to prevent unnecessary surgery in a large proportion of cases missed by CT scanning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17296659     DOI: 10.1378/chest.06-1437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  69 in total

Review 1.  Acquisition and processing of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration specimens in the era of targeted lung cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  William Bulman; Anjali Saqi; Charles A Powell
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 2.  Levels of evidence in endoscopic ultrasonography: a systematic review.

Authors:  Pietro Fusaroli; Dimitrios Kypraios; Mohamad A Eloubeidi; Giancarlo Caletti
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  A comparison of the combined ultrasound of the mediastinum by use of a single ultrasound bronchoscope versus ultrasound bronchoscope plus ultrasound gastroscope in lung cancer staging: a prospective trial.

Authors:  Artur Szlubowski; Jerzy Soja; Piotr Kocon; Piotr Talar; Wojciech Czajkowski; Lucyna Rudnicka-Sosin; Adam Cmiel; Jaroslaw Kuzdzal
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-05-23

Review 4.  Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography.

Authors:  Nischita K Reddy; Ana Maria Ioncică; Adrian Săftoiu; Peter Vilmann; Manoop S Bhutani
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Ultrasound techniques in the evaluation of the mediastinum, part 2: mediastinal lymph node anatomy and diagnostic reach of ultrasound techniques, clinical work up of neoplastic and inflammatory mediastinal lymphadenopathy using ultrasound techniques and how to learn mediastinal endosonography.

Authors:  Christian Jenssen; Jouke Tabe Annema; Paul Clementsen; Xin-Wu Cui; Mathias Maximilian Borst; Christoph Frank Dietrich
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 6.  [Transesophageal ultrasonography for mediastinum diagnostics].

Authors:  E Günter
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 7.  Lung Cancer OncoGuia.

Authors:  Paula Manchon Walsh; Paula Manchon; Josep M Borràs; Tàrsila Ferro; Josep Alfons Espinàs
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 8.  Endoscopic ultrasound advances, part 1: diagnosis.

Authors:  Edward Kim; Jennifer J Telford
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.522

9.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for suspected malignancies adjacent to the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Pietro Gambitta; Antonio Armellino; Edoardo Forti; Maurizio Vertemati; Paola Enrica Colombo; Paolo Aseni
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Lung cancer diagnosis and staging in the minimally invasive age with increasing demands for tissue analysis.

Authors:  Erik Folch; Daniel B Costa; Jeffrey Wright; Paul A VanderLaan
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.