BACKGROUND:Intradialytic morbid events (IMEs, mostly hypotension) are frequent complications during hemodialysis (HD). This study investigated whether automatic feedback control via adjustment of the ultrafiltration rate reduces IME frequency. METHODS: In this multi-center cross-over study, 56 hypotension-prone patients were treated both with standard HD (sHD, applying a constant ultrafiltration rate) and HD applying a blood volume controlled ultrafiltration rate (cHD). The relative blood volume (RBV) was continuously monitored. The individual relative blood volume limit (RBVcrit ) was determined from the measured RBV during initial sHD. During cHD, the ultrafiltration rate was automatically adjusted to keep the actual RBV above RBVcrit. RESULTS: In 3,081 HD treatments, slightly fewer IMEs were observed during cHD than during sHD (0.785+/-0.613 versus 0.695+/-0.547 per treatment, P=0.144). Less symptomatic events were seen during cHD: -13% for symptomatic hypotension (0.594 versus 0.685 per treatment, P=0.120), and -32% for cramps (0.049 versus 0.072 per treatment, P=0.009). Thirty-one patients with the highest IME rate (IME in at least every second treatment) especially benefited from cHD: 1.185+/-0.554 versus 0.979+/-0.543 IME per treatment (P=0.004). The reduction in blood pressure (BP) and the increase in heart rate were lower during the treatments with cHD than with sHD: systolic BP: -18.8+/-26.7 versus -22.2+/-28.9 mmHg (P=0.007), diastolic BP: -7.8+/-14.8 versus -9.1+/-15.3 mmHg (P=0.064), heart rate: 1.8+/-10.4 versus 2.3+/-11.6 per minute (P=0.014). Neither treatment duration nor ultrafiltration volume was significantly different between cHD and sHD. CONCLUSION: For cHD, less intradialytic morbid events were observed than for sHD, and pre- to post-dialytic changes in blood pressure and heart rate were less pronounced.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Intradialytic morbid events (IMEs, mostly hypotension) are frequent complications during hemodialysis (HD). This study investigated whether automatic feedback control via adjustment of the ultrafiltration rate reduces IME frequency. METHODS: In this multi-center cross-over study, 56 hypotension-prone patients were treated both with standard HD (sHD, applying a constant ultrafiltration rate) and HD applying a blood volume controlled ultrafiltration rate (cHD). The relative blood volume (RBV) was continuously monitored. The individual relative blood volume limit (RBVcrit ) was determined from the measured RBV during initial sHD. During cHD, the ultrafiltration rate was automatically adjusted to keep the actual RBV above RBVcrit. RESULTS: In 3,081 HD treatments, slightly fewer IMEs were observed during cHD than during sHD (0.785+/-0.613 versus 0.695+/-0.547 per treatment, P=0.144). Less symptomatic events were seen during cHD: -13% for symptomatic hypotension (0.594 versus 0.685 per treatment, P=0.120), and -32% for cramps (0.049 versus 0.072 per treatment, P=0.009). Thirty-one patients with the highest IME rate (IME in at least every second treatment) especially benefited from cHD: 1.185+/-0.554 versus 0.979+/-0.543 IME per treatment (P=0.004). The reduction in blood pressure (BP) and the increase in heart rate were lower during the treatments with cHD than with sHD: systolic BP: -18.8+/-26.7 versus -22.2+/-28.9 mmHg (P=0.007), diastolic BP: -7.8+/-14.8 versus -9.1+/-15.3 mmHg (P=0.064), heart rate: 1.8+/-10.4 versus 2.3+/-11.6 per minute (P=0.014). Neither treatment duration nor ultrafiltration volume was significantly different between cHD and sHD. CONCLUSION: For cHD, less intradialytic morbid events were observed than for sHD, and pre- to post-dialytic changes in blood pressure and heart rate were less pronounced.
Authors: Simon Krenn; Michael Schmiedecker; Daniel Schneditz; Sebastian Hödlmoser; Christopher C Mayer; Siegfried Wassertheurer; Haris Omic; Eva Schernhammer; Peter Wabel; Manfred Hecking Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2022-02-10