Literature DB >> 17294074

Carcinoid of the rectum risk stratification (CaRRs): a strategy for preoperative outcome assessment.

Bridget N Fahy1, Laura H Tang, David Klimstra, W Douglas Wong, Jose G Guillem, Philip B Paty, Larissa K F Temple, Jinru Shia, Martin R Weiser.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Predicting rectal carcinoid behavior based exclusively on tumor size is imprecise. We sought to identify factors associated with outcome and incorporate them into a pre-operative risk stratification scheme.
METHODS: Seventy rectal carcinoid patients evaluated at our institution were identified. Demographic, clinical, and histopathologic data were collected and correlated with recurrence and survival.
RESULTS: The mean age of our cohort was 53.6 years. Fifty-seven percent of patients were female. The mean tumor size was 1.3 cm (range: 0.1-5 cm). Twenty-five percent of patients had deeply invasive tumors (into the muscularis propria or deeper); an equal percentage had tumors with lymphovascular invasion (LVI) or an elevated mitotic rate (> or =2/50 HPF). Eleven patients (17%) had distant metastases at presentation. Sixty-one patients were followed for a median of 22 months (2-308 months), during which seven patients developed recurrence and seven died of disease (2/7 who developed recurrence). Poor outcome was associated with large tumor size, deep invasion, presence of LVI, and elevated mitotic rate. These factors were incorporated into a carcinoid of the rectum risk stratification (CaRRS) score. CaRRS predicted recurrence-free and disease-specific survival better than any single factor alone.
CONCLUSIONS: Poor prognostic features of rectal carcinoids include: large size, deep invasion, LVI, and elevated mitotic rate. The CaRRS score incorporates these features and accurately predicts outcome. Because the CaRRS score is based upon values available on pre-operative biopsy, it can identify patients with very favorable prognosis as well as those with poor prognosis that may benefit from additional staging or surveillance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17294074     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-006-9311-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  33 in total

1.  Excellent prognosis following endoscopic resection of patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors despite the frequent presence of lymphovascular invasion.

Authors:  Masau Sekiguchi; Shigeki Sekine; Taku Sakamoto; Yosuke Otake; Takeshi Nakajima; Takahisa Matsuda; Hirokazu Taniguchi; Ryoji Kushima; Yuichiro Ohe; Yutaka Saito
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 7.527

2.  A novel preoperative risk score to predict lymph node positivity for rectal neuroendocrine tumors: An NCDB analysis to guide operative technique.

Authors:  Adriana C Gamboa; Yuan Liu; Rachel M Lee; Mohammad Y Zaidi; Charles A Staley; Maria C Russell; Kenneth Cardona; Patrick S Sullivan; Shishir K Maithel
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 3.  Pathologic research update of colorectal neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Shu-Juan Ni; Wei-Qi Sheng; Xiang Du
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Clinicopathological characteristics of rectal carcinoids.

Authors:  Sang Nam Yoon; Chang Sik Yu; Ui Sup Shin; Chan Wook Kim; Seok-Byung Lim; Jin Cheon Kim
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Factors associated with complete local excision of small rectal carcinoid tumor.

Authors:  Hae-Jung Son; Dae Kyung Sohn; Chang Won Hong; Kyung Su Han; Byung Chang Kim; Ji Won Park; Hyo Seong Choi; Hee Jin Chang; Jae Hwan Oh
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-07-22       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Analysis of the factors affecting lymph node metastasis and the prognosis of rectal neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Peng Li; Fan Wu; Hong Zhao; Lizhou Dou; Yang Wang; Chunguang Guo; Guiqi Wang; Dongbing Zhao
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-10-01

Review 7.  [Neuroendocrine colorectal tumors. Surgical and endoscopic treatment].

Authors:  H G Hotz; C Bojarski; H J Buhr
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  Clinicopathological characteristics of rectal carcinoid patients undergoing surgical resection.

Authors:  Daisuke Yamagishi; Nagahide Matsubara; Masafumi Noda; Tomoki Yamano; Kiyoshi Tsukamoto; Takashi Kuno; Mie Hamanaka; Masayoshi Kobayashi; Hiroki Ikeuchi; Ikuo Matsuda; Seiichi Hirota; Naohiro Tomita
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 2.967

9.  Atypical endoscopic features can be associated with metastasis in rectal carcinoid tumors.

Authors:  Byung Nyun Kim; Dae Kyung Sohn; Chang Won Hong; Kyung Su Han; Hee Jin Chang; Kyung Hae Jung; Seok-Byung Lim; Hyo Seong Choi; Seung-Yong Jeong; Jae-Gahb Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Lymph-node metastases in rectal carcinoids.

Authors:  Yoshiya Fujimoto; Masatoshi Oya; Hiroya Kuroyanagi; Masashi Ueno; Takashi Akiyoshi; Toshiharu Yamaguchi; Tetsuichiro Muto
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.