Literature DB >> 17293849

Breakdown of the adiabatic Born-Oppenheimer approximation in graphene.

Simone Pisana1, Michele Lazzeri, Cinzia Casiraghi, Kostya S Novoselov, A K Geim, Andrea C Ferrari, Francesco Mauri.   

Abstract

The adiabatic Born-Oppenheimer approximation (ABO) has been the standard ansatz to describe the interaction between electrons and nuclei since the early days of quantum mechanics. ABO assumes that the lighter electrons adjust adiabatically to the motion of the heavier nuclei, remaining at any time in their instantaneous ground state. ABO is well justified when the energy gap between ground and excited electronic states is larger than the energy scale of the nuclear motion. In metals, the gap is zero and phenomena beyond ABO (such as phonon-mediated superconductivity or phonon-induced renormalization of the electronic properties) occur. The use of ABO to describe lattice motion in metals is, therefore, questionable. In spite of this, ABO has proved effective for the accurate determination of chemical reactions, molecular dynamics and phonon frequencies in a wide range of metallic systems. Here, we show that ABO fails in graphene. Graphene, recently discovered in the free state, is a zero-bandgap semiconductor that becomes a metal if the Fermi energy is tuned applying a gate voltage, Vg. This induces a stiffening of the Raman G peak that cannot be described within ABO.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 17293849     DOI: 10.1038/nmat1846

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Mater        ISSN: 1476-1122            Impact factor:   43.841


  66 in total

1.  Unusual infrared-absorption mechanism in thermally reduced graphene oxide.

Authors:  M Acik; G Lee; C Mattevi; M Chhowalla; K Cho; Y J Chabal
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2010-09-19       Impact factor: 43.841

2.  The shear mode of multilayer graphene.

Authors:  P H Tan; W P Han; W J Zhao; Z H Wu; K Chang; H Wang; Y F Wang; N Bonini; N Marzari; N Pugno; G Savini; A Lombardo; A C Ferrari
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 43.841

3.  Phonon softening and crystallographic orientation of strained graphene studied by Raman spectroscopy.

Authors:  Mingyuan Huang; Hugen Yan; Changyao Chen; Daohua Song; Tony F Heinz; James Hone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A tunable phonon-exciton Fano system in bilayer graphene.

Authors:  Tsung-Ta Tang; Yuanbo Zhang; Cheol-Hwan Park; Baisong Geng; Caglar Girit; Zhao Hao; Michael C Martin; Alex Zettl; Michael F Crommie; Steven G Louie; Y Ron Shen; Feng Wang
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 39.213

5.  Controlling inelastic light scattering quantum pathways in graphene.

Authors:  Chi-Fan Chen; Cheol-Hwan Park; Bryan W Boudouris; Jason Horng; Baisong Geng; Caglar Girit; Alex Zettl; Michael F Crommie; Rachel A Segalman; Steven G Louie; Feng Wang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Lazy electrons in graphene.

Authors:  Vaibhav Mohanty; Eric J Heller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Raman spectroscopy as a versatile tool for studying the properties of graphene.

Authors:  Andrea C Ferrari; Denis M Basko
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 39.213

8.  Janus graphene from asymmetric two-dimensional chemistry.

Authors:  Liming Zhang; Jingwen Yu; Mingmei Yang; Qin Xie; Hailin Peng; Zhongfan Liu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Softening of the radial breathing mode in metallic carbon nanotubes.

Authors:  H Farhat; K Sasaki; M Kalbac; M Hofmann; R Saito; M S Dresselhaus; J Kong
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 9.161

10.  Optical separation of mechanical strain from charge doping in graphene.

Authors:  Ji Eun Lee; Gwanghyun Ahn; Jihye Shim; Young Sik Lee; Sunmin Ryu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.