Literature DB >> 17293610

Impact on maternity professionals of novel approaches to clinical audit feedback.

Martin Cameron1, Gillian Penney, Graeme Maclennan, Sharon McLeer, Anne Walker.   

Abstract

The authors compared three approaches to feedback of clinical audit findings relating to miscarriage in 15 Scottish maternity services (printed report alone; report plus action planning letter; report plus face-to-face facilitated action planning). Clinicians were surveyed to measure theory of planned behavior constructs (in the context of two audit criteria) before and after feedback (n = 253) and assessed perceptions of the audit through in-depth interviews (n = 17). Prefeedback, clinicians had positive attitudes and strong subjective norms and intentions to comply, although perceived behavioral control was lower. Generally, positive attitudes, subjective norms, and intentions increased after feedback but for one of the two criteria (providing a 7-day miscarriage service), perceived behavioral control decreased. No changes over time reached statistical significance, and analysis of covariance (adjusting for prefeedback scores) showed no consistent relationships between method of feedback and postfeedback construct scores. Interviews revealed positive perceptions of audit but frustration at lack of capacity to implement changes. Although interventions that increased intensity of feedback proved feasible and acceptable to clinicians, the authors were unable to demonstrate that they increased intention to comply with audit criteria.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17293610     DOI: 10.1177/0163278706297337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eval Health Prof        ISSN: 0163-2787            Impact factor:   2.651


  3 in total

1.  Impact of attributed audit on procedural performance in cardiac electrophysiology catheter laboratory.

Authors:  V Sawhney; E Volkova; M Shaukat; F Khan; O Segal; S Ahsan; A Chow; V Ezzat; M Finlay; P Lambiase; M Lowe; M Dhinoja; S Sporton; M J Earley; R J Hunter; R J Schilling
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 2.  Clinical performance comparators in audit and feedback: a review of theory and evidence.

Authors:  Wouter T Gude; Benjamin Brown; Sabine N van der Veer; Heather L Colquhoun; Noah M Ivers; Jamie C Brehaut; Zach Landis-Lewis; Christopher J Armitage; Nicolette F de Keizer; Niels Peek
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 7.327

3.  Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory (CP-FIT): a new theory for designing, implementing, and evaluating feedback in health care based on a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research.

Authors:  Benjamin Brown; Wouter T Gude; Thomas Blakeman; Sabine N van der Veer; Noah Ivers; Jill J Francis; Fabiana Lorencatto; Justin Presseau; Niels Peek; Gavin Daker-White
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 7.327

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.