Literature DB >> 17293284

Comparison of the effectiveness of gene therapy with vascular endothelial growth factor or shock wave therapy to reduce ischaemic necrosis in an epigastric skin flap model in rats.

R Meirer1, G M Huemer, M Oehlbauer, S Wanner, H Piza-Katzer, F S Kamelger.   

Abstract

The effect of gene therapy with adenovirus-mediated (Ad) vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was compared to that of shock wave (SW) therapy on skin flap survival in a rat model, using the epigastric skin flap, based solely on the right inferior epigastric vessels. Thirty male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into three groups (SW-group, Ad-VEGF-group, and Control-group) of 10 rats each. Immediately after surgery, the SW-group was administered 2500 impulses at 0.15mJ/mm(2), in the Ad-VEGF-group injections were made to the subdermal space whereas the Control-group received no treatment. Flap viability was evaluated on day 7 after the operation. Standardised digital pictures of the flaps were taken and transferred to the computer, and necrotic zones relative to total flap surface area were measured and expressed as percentages. Overall, significantly smaller areas of necrotic zones were noted in the SW-group and the Ad-VEGF-group compared with the Control-group (SW-group: median 2.23% (range: 0-5.1) versus Control-group: median 17.4% (range: 11.8-22.8) (p<0.05); Ad-VEGF-group: median 9.25% (range: 7.6-11.9) versus Control-group: median 17.4% (range: 11.8-22.8) (p<0.05)). Furthermore, in the SW-group, areas of necrotic zones were significantly smaller than in Ad-VEGF-group (SW-group: median 2.23% (range: 0-5.1) versus Ad-VEGF-group: median 9.25% (range: 7.6-11.9) (p<0.05)). We conclude that treatment with SW enhances epigastric skin flap survival significantly more than Ad-VEGF treatment and also represents a feasible and cost effective technique to improve blood supply in ischaemic tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17293284     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2005.12.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  5 in total

1.  Acoustic field characterization of the Duolith: measurements and modeling of a clinical shock wave therapy device.

Authors:  Camilo Perez; Hong Chen; Thomas J Matula; Maria Karzova; Vera A Khokhlova
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Study of vascular injuries using endothelial denudation model and the therapeutic application of shock wave: a review.

Authors:  Cheuk-Kwan Sun; Pei-Lin Shao; Ching-Jen Wang; Hon-Kan Yip
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 4.060

3.  [Extracorporeal shock wave therapy as a treatment of a non-healing chronic leg ulcer].

Authors:  M Stieger; J-P Schmid; S Bajrami; T Hunziker
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 0.751

4.  Shock wave treatment in composite tissue allotransplantation.

Authors:  Christian Andreas Radu; Jurij Kiefer; Dominik Horn; Martin Rebel; Eva Koellensperger; Martha Maria Gebhard; Henning Ryssel; Guenter Germann; Matthias Artur Reichenberger
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2011-09-15

5.  Effect of extracorporeal shock wave treatment on deep partial-thickness burn injury in rats: a pilot study.

Authors:  Gabriel Djedovic; Florian Stefan Kamelger; Johannes Jeschke; Hildegunde Piza-Katzer
Journal:  Plast Surg Int       Date:  2014-11-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.