Literature DB >> 17293088

Ertapenem resistance among Klebsiella and Enterobacter submitted in the UK to a reference laboratory.

Neil Woodford1, John W T Dallow, Robert L R Hill, Marie-France I Palepou, Rachel Pike, M Elaina Ward, Marina Warner, David M Livermore.   

Abstract

The emergence of carbapenem resistance in Enterobacteriaceae represents a major public health concern. We investigated ertapenem-resistant clinical isolates of Klebsiella spp. and Enterobacter spp. referred to the UK's national reference laboratory for antibiotic resistance. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined and interpreted according to British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy guidelines. Genes for carbapenemases and CTX-M extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) were sought by polymerase chain reaction, and imipenem hydrolysis was determined by spectrophotometry with crude extracts. From June 2004 to April 2006, 95 Klebsiella spp. and 76 Enterobacter spp. isolates resistant to ertapenem (MICs >2mg/L) were received, 40% of which (38 Klebsiella spp. and 30 Enterobacter spp.) were highly resistant to ertapenem (MICs >16mg/L). Imipenem and meropenem were active (geometric mean MICs <2mg/L) against most isolates with low-level ertapenem resistance but were less active against highly ertapenem-resistant isolates. Only one ertapenem-resistant isolate produced a defined carbapenemase, a Klebsiella pneumoniae with IMP-1 enzyme; one Enterobacter sp. also hydrolysed imipenem, but its carbapenemase remains to be identified. Geometric mean MICs of ertapenem for the collection were reduced five-fold by clavulanic acid for Klebsiella spp. compared with eight-fold by cloxacillin for Enterobacter spp. This study highlights the fact that ertapenem resistance is being detected in Klebsiella spp. and Enterobacter spp. in the UK, but that it is rarely mediated by true carbapenemases. Rather, it probably results from combinations of a beta-lactamase - often a CTX-M ESBL in Klebsiella spp. or an AmpC enzyme in Enterobacter spp. - plus impermeability and/or increased efflux. Imipenem and meropenem often remain moderately active against isolates with low-level ertapenem resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17293088     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2006.11.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents        ISSN: 0924-8579            Impact factor:   5.283


  39 in total

1.  Comparison of BD Phoenix, Vitek 2, and MicroScan automated systems for detection and inference of mechanisms responsible for carbapenem resistance in Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Neil Woodford; Anne T Eastaway; Michael Ford; Alistair Leanord; Chloe Keane; Reinhard M Quayle; Jane A Steer; Jiancheng Zhang; David M Livermore
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Specificity of ertapenem susceptibility screening for detection of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases.

Authors:  Shannon E McGettigan; Kathleen Andreacchio; Paul H Edelstein
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Redefining extended-spectrum beta-lactamases: balancing science and clinical need.

Authors:  Christian G Giske; Arnfinn S Sundsfjord; Gunnar Kahlmeter; Neil Woodford; Patrice Nordmann; David L Paterson; Rafael Cantón; Timothy R Walsh
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  Activities of NXL104 combinations with ceftazidime and aztreonam against carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  David M Livermore; Shazad Mushtaq; Marina Warner; Jiancheng Zhang; Sunil Maharjan; Michel Doumith; Neil Woodford
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Susceptibility of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from intra-abdominal infections and molecular characterization of ertapenem-resistant isolates.

Authors:  Stephen P Hawser; Samuel K Bouchillon; Christine Lascols; Meredith Hackel; Daryl J Hoban; Robert E Badal; Neil Woodford; David M Livermore
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Comparative evaluation of a chromogenic agar medium, the modified Hodge test, and a battery of meropenem-inhibitor discs for detection of carbapenemase activity in Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Christine Seah; Donald E Low; Samir N Patel; Roberto G Melano
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Accuracy of carbapenem nonsusceptibility for identification of KPC-possessing Enterobacteriaceae by use of the revised CLSI breakpoints.

Authors:  David Landman; Julius Salamera; Manisha Singh; John Quale
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  In Vitro Susceptibility to Ceftazidime-Avibactam of Carbapenem-Nonsusceptible Enterobacteriaceae Isolates Collected during the INFORM Global Surveillance Study (2012 to 2014).

Authors:  Boudewijn L M de Jonge; James A Karlowsky; Krystyna M Kazmierczak; Douglas J Biedenbach; Daniel F Sahm; Wright W Nichols
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  Carbapenemases in Klebsiella pneumoniae and other Enterobacteriaceae: an evolving crisis of global dimensions.

Authors:  L S Tzouvelekis; A Markogiannakis; M Psichogiou; P T Tassios; G L Daikos
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 26.132

10.  Ertapenem resistance among extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates.

Authors:  Azita Leavitt; Inna Chmelnitsky; Raul Colodner; Itzhak Ofek; Yehuda Carmeli; Shiri Navon-Venezia
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.