Literature DB >> 17292971

Discriminant validity of the MASQ in a clinical sample.

Mark J Boschen1, Tian P S Oei.   

Abstract

A major weakness of the Mood and Anxiety Symptom Questionnaire (MASQ) is that its discriminant validity has not been demonstrated in a clinical population of anxiety and mood disorder patients. This paper, using 470 anxiety and mood disorder patients, assessed the discriminant validity of the MASQ. The MASQ subscales showed statistically significant discriminant validity, but their maximum ability to discriminate is low at 70%. Overall it was concluded that the MASQ had very weak clinical utility in differentiating anxiety and mood disorder patients, and gave rise to doubts as to the tripartite structure of the MASQ. When using the MASQ, future researchers should be mindful of its limitations when applied in a clinical population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17292971     DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2006.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry Res        ISSN: 0165-1781            Impact factor:   3.222


  8 in total

1.  Establishing a common metric for self-reported anxiety: linking the MASQ, PANAS, and GAD-7 to PROMIS Anxiety.

Authors:  Benjamin D Schalet; Karon F Cook; Seung W Choi; David Cella
Journal:  J Anxiety Disord       Date:  2013-12-01

2.  Stress-related anhedonia is associated with ventral striatum reactivity to reward and transdiagnostic psychiatric symptomatology.

Authors:  N S Corral-Frías; Y S Nikolova; L J Michalski; D A A Baranger; A R Hariri; R Bogdan
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 7.723

3.  Screening for depressive disorders using the Mood and Anxiety Symptoms Questionnaire Anhedonic Depression Scale: a receiver-operating characteristic analysis.

Authors:  Keith Bredemeier; Jeffery M Spielberg; Rebecca Levin Silton; Howard Berenbaum; Wendy Heller; Gregory A Miller
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2010-09

4.  Predictive utility of symptom measures in classifying anxiety and depression: A machine-learning approach.

Authors:  Kevin Liu; Brian Droncheff; Stacie L Warren
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 11.225

5.  Cognitive load and emotional processing in generalized anxiety disorder: electrocortical evidence for increased distractibility.

Authors:  Annmarie MacNamara; Greg Hajcak Proudfit
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2014-06-16

6.  To what extent does the anxiety scale of the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ) detect specific types of anxiety disorder in primary care? A psychometric study.

Authors:  Berend Terluin; Desiree B Oosterbaan; Evelien P M Brouwers; Annemieke van Straten; Peter M van de Ven; Wendy Langerak; Harm W J van Marwijk
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.630

7.  Effectiveness of enhanced cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT-E) for eating disorders: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Martie de Jong; Kees Korrelboom; Iris van der Meer; Mathijs Deen; Hans W Hoek; Philip Spinhoven
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-12-03       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Clinical utility of the Mood and Anxiety Symptom Questionnaire (MASQ) in a sample of young help-seekers.

Authors:  Joe A Buckby; Alison R Yung; Elizabeth M Cosgrave; Eoin J Killackey
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 3.630

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.