Literature DB >> 17292812

The pervasive influence of effort on neuropsychological tests.

Paul Green1.   

Abstract

Although it is obvious that people exerting full effort on a test score higher than people making less effort, it is not obvious to what degree poor effort affects neuropsychological test scores. Nor is it self-evident how well scores on an effort test based on memory predict scores on non-memory tests. In this study, effort was measured in 1307 consecutive outpatients using the Word Memory Test (WMT). The mean WMT effort scores were divided into six ranges, from satisfactory (91% to 100% correct) to very low (50% correct or less). The tables show the mean scores on many commonly used neuropsychological tests for each range of effort on the WMT. As effort decreases, scores on most tests decrease significantly and systematically. In this sample, the variable of effort had more impact on test scores than severe traumatic brain injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17292812     DOI: 10.1016/j.pmr.2006.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am        ISSN: 1047-9651            Impact factor:   1.784


  8 in total

1.  Examination of the construct validity of ImPACT™ computerized test, traditional, and experimental neuropsychological measures.

Authors:  A Maerlender; L Flashman; A Kessler; S Kumbhani; R Greenwald; T Tosteson; T McAllister
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 2.  Test validity and performance validity: considerations in providing a framework for development of an ability-focused neuropsychological test battery.

Authors:  Glenn J Larrabee
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 2.813

3.  Patterns of Cognitive Test Scores and Symptom Complaints in Persons with TBI Who Failed Performance Validity Testing.

Authors:  Mark Sherer; Angelle M Sander; Jennie Ponsford; Leia Vos; Julia M P Poritz; Esther Ngan; Luis Leon Novelo
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 2.892

4.  Does Validity Measure Response Affect CPT Group Outcomes in Veterans with PTSD?

Authors:  M Wright Williams; David Graham; Nicole A Sciarrino; Matt Estey; Katherine L McCurry; Pearl Chiu; Brooks King-Casas
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 1.437

5.  Impaired auditory processing and neural representation of speech in noise among symptomatic post-concussion adults.

Authors:  Kathy R Vander Werff; Brian Rieger
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Assessment of feigned cognitive impairment in severe traumatic brain injury patients with the Forced-choice Graphics Memory Test.

Authors:  Zilong Liu; Juan Dong; Xiaohong Zhao; Xiaorui Chen; Sara M Lippa; Jerome S Caroselli; Xiang Fang
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 2.708

7.  Working memory load improves diagnostic performance of smooth pursuit eye movement in mild traumatic brain injury patients with protracted recovery.

Authors:  Jacob L Stubbs; Sherryse L Corrow; Benjamin R Kiang; Jeffrey C Corrow; Hadley L Pearce; Alex Y Cheng; Jason J S Barton; William J Panenka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Effort, symptom validity testing, performance validity testing and traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Erin D Bigler
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 2.311

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.