Literature DB >> 17292419

Predictive factors for complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Qingbao Cheng1, Baihe Zhang, Yongjie Zhang, Xiaoqing Jiang, Baohua Zhang, Bin Yi, Xiangji Luo, Mengchao Wu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of the risk factors for complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is sparse and there is not a consensus regarding the criteria to define the complications. The objective of this study was to determine the predictive risk factors for this surgery using the international study group definition. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 1999 and September 2005, data from 295 consecutive patients who underwent a PD in the Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital were recorded prospectively. Medical records and specific charts from surgical procedures, histopathology reports, and intensive care units were continually scrutinized. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to estimate relative risks and their 95% confidence intervals.
RESULTS: Among 295 patients undergoing PD, 103 (34.9%) experienced at least one complication. Operations by low-volume surgeons (<50 PD surgeries across their lifetime) were followed by more abdominal complications (odds ratio [OR] 45.2). End-to-end pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) resulted in more complications than end-to-side PJ (OR 2.7). Diabetes mellitus, increased estimated blood loss, and soft gland texture significantly increased the risks of abdominal complications. Systemic morbidity (OR 9.9) was the only independent predictive factor for mortality.
CONCLUSION: High-volume surgeons and end-to-side PJ greatly reduce the risk of abdominal complications in patients undergoing PD. The higher abdominal complications rate in patients with soft gland texture was similar to those found in previous reports. Moreover, PD should be performed with considerable attention in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17292419     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2006.07.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  18 in total

1.  Multi-institutional analysis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma demonstrating the effect of diabetes status on survival after resection.

Authors:  Robert M Cannon; Ryan LeGrand; Ryaz B Chagpar; Syed A Ahmad; Rebecca McClaine; Hong Jin Kim; Christopher Rupp; Cliff S Cho; Adam Brinkman; Sharon Weber; Emily R Winslow; David A Kooby; Carrie K Chu; Charles A Staley; Ian Glenn; William G Hawkins; Alexander A Parikh; Nipun B Merchant; Kelly M McMasters; Robert C G Martin; Glenda G Callender; Charles R Scoggins
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  The Impact of Surgeon Volume on Outcomes After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Francisco Igor B Macedo; Prakash Jayanthi; Mia Mowzoon; Danny Yakoub; Vikas Dudeja; Nipun Merchant
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Moving towards the New International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definitions in pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comparison between the old and new.

Authors:  Winson Jianhong Tan; Alfred Wei Chieh Kow; Kui Hin Liau
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Postoperative serum amylase predicts pancreatic fistula formation following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Jordan M Cloyd; Zachary J Kastenberg; Brendan C Visser; George A Poultsides; Jeffrey A Norton
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Risk by indication for pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients 80 years and older: a study from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  John R Bergquist; Christopher R Shubert; Daniel S Ubl; Cornelius A Thiels; Michael L Kendrick; Mark J Truty; Elizabeth B Habermann
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  The impact of internal or external transanastomotic pancreatic duct stents following pancreaticojejunostomy. Which one is better? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu Zhou; Quanbo Zhou; Zhihua Li; Qing Lin; Yuanfeng Gong; Rufu Chen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  An easier method for performing a pancreaticojejunostomy for the soft pancreas using a fast-absorbable suture.

Authors:  Kenichi Hakamada; Shunji Narumi; Yoshikazu Toyoki; Masaki Nara; Kenosuke Ishido; Takuya Miura; Norihito Kubo; Mutsuo Sasaki
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Predictive factors for pancreatic fistula following pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Matthew T McMillan; Charles M Vollmer
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 9.  Toward defining grade C pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence, risk factors, management and outcome.

Authors:  Jason W Denbo; W Shannon Orr; Ben L Zarzaur; Stephen W Behrman
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 3.647

10.  Pancreatic fistula after a pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma and its association with morbidity: a multicentre study of the French Surgical Association.

Authors:  Pietro Addeo; Jean Robert Delpero; Francois Paye; Elie Oussoultzoglou; Pascal R Fuchshuber; Alain Sauvanet; Antonio Sa Cunha; Yves Patrice Le Treut; Mustapha Adham; Jean-Yves Mabrut; Laurence Chiche; Philippe Bachellier
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.647

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.