Literature DB >> 17291807

[Is primiparity, the only risk factor for type 3 and 4 perineal injury, during delivery?].

A Barbier1, O Poujade, R Fay, O Thiébaugeorges, M Levardon, B Deval.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Primiparity has been identified as the main risk factor of type 3 and 4 perineal injuries The purpose of our study, according to a population-based observational study, was to identify other clinical risk factors for lesions during vaginal delivery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two groups have been compared. Group A or study group (n=63) was defined as parturients with three or four-degree perineal tears. Group B or control group (n=67) included women who delivered vaginally without any perineal lesion during the same period. Characteristics of the population were compared: maternal age, race, maternal weight, BMI (Body Mass Index), parity, mode of anaesthesia, gestational age, post maturity, length of labor, fetal weight, mode of delivery (assisted or not). Specific characteristics were also compared, obesity, shoulder dystocia, type of presentation, episiotomy and dose of ocytocin.
RESULTS: Primiparity was significantly associated with higher frequency of sphincter lacerations (71 vs 43%, p=0.001). The patients of group A were with significantly higher weight than the patients of control group (67 vs 63 kg, p=0.036). Futhermore the BMI was different in the two groups (25,6 vs 23,4, p=0.003). There was a significant difference according to the length of the second part of labor (68 vs 48 min, p=0.037) and the posterior variety (32 vs 4%, p<0.001). The occurrence of shoulder dystocia was only just significant (6 vs 0%, p=0.052). Assisted-extraction is highly associated with perineal injuries (44 vs 1%, p<0.001). Futhermore the instrument has been concerned by the difference: Tarnier's forceps-assisted extraction (14 vs 1%, p=0.003), Suzor's forceps-assisted extraction (16 vs 0%, p=0.0005), Thierry's spatula-assisted extraction (14 vs 0%, p=0,0005). The association forceps and episiotomy has been found with higher frequency of perineal injury (43 vs 1%, p<0,0001). There were no difference between the 2 groups according fetal characteristics, type of analgesia, maternal age, gestational age, post-maturity or dose of ocytocin. DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSION: Primiparity is not the only risk factor of perineal injuries. Other risk factors have been found: assisted-extraction, occiput posterior fetal head position, and association episiotomy and assisted-extraction. Black origin seems to be protective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17291807     DOI: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2006.12.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Fertil        ISSN: 1297-9589


  4 in total

Review 1.  Maternal postures for fetal malposition in labour for improving the health of mothers and their infants.

Authors:  Jennifer A Barrowclough; Luling Lin; Bridget Kool; G Justus Hofmeyr; Caroline A Crowther
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-08-31

2.  The Portuguese validation of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Vaginal Symptoms (ICIQ-VS) for Brazilian women with pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  José Tadeu Nunes Tamanini; Fernando G Almeida; Marcia Eli Girotti; Cássio L Z Riccetto; Paulo C R Palma; Luis Augusto S Rios
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-05-28

3.  Maternal body mass index and risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury.

Authors:  Marie Blomberg
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  Risk factors for recurrent obstetric anal sphincter injury (rOASI): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Swati Jha; Victoria Parker
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 2.894

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.