Literature DB >> 17291792

Identification of skills common to renal and iliac endovascular procedures performed on a virtual reality simulator.

S K Neequaye1, R Aggarwal, R Brightwell, I Van Herzeele, A Darzi, N J W Cheshire.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: There is a learning curve in the acquisition of endovascular skills for the treatment of vascular disease. Integration of Virtual reality (VR) simulator based training into the educational training curriculum offers a potential solution to overcome this learning curve. However evidence-based training curricula that define which tasks, how often and in which order they should be performed have yet to be developed. The aim of this study was to determine the nature of skills acquisition on the renal and iliac modules of a commercially-available VR simulator.
METHOD: 20 surgical trainees without endovascular experience were randomised to complete eight sessions on a VR iliac (group A) or renal (group B) training module. To determine skills transferability across the two procedures, all subjects performed two further VR cases of the other procedure. Performance was recorded by the simulator for parameters such as time taken, contrast fluid usage and stent placement accuracy.
RESULTS: During training, both groups demonstrated statistically significant VR learning curves: group A for procedure time (p<0.001) and stent placement accuracy (p=0.013) group B for procedure time (p<0.001), fluoroscopy time (p=0.003) and volume of contrast fluid used (p<0.001). At crossover, subjects in group B (renal trained) performed to the same level of skill on the simulated iliac task as group A. However, those in group A (iliac trained) had a significantly higher fluoroscopy time (median 118 vs 72 secs, p=0.020) when performing their first simulated renal task than for group B.
CONCLUSION: Novice endovascular surgeons can significantly improve their performance of simulated procedures through repeated practice on VR simulators. Skills transfer between tasks was demonstrated but complex task training, such as selective arterial cannulation in simulators and possibly in the real world appears to involve a separate skill. It is thus suggested that a stepwise and hierarchical training curriculum is developed for acquisition of endovascular skill using VR simulation to supplement training on patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17291792     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.12.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg        ISSN: 1078-5884            Impact factor:   7.069


  7 in total

1.  Using simulation for interventional radiology training.

Authors:  D Gould
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Training on a vascular interventional simulator: an observational study.

Authors:  Darren Klass; Matthew D B S Tam; John Cockburn; Stuart Williams; Andoni P Toms
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Procedural virtual reality simulation in minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Cecilie Våpenstad; Sonja N Buzink
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  A basic arthroscopy course based on motor skill training.

Authors:  Pemra C Unalan; Kaya Akan; Haldun Orhun; Umut Akgun; Oguz Poyanli; Asim Baykan; Yunus Yavuz; Tahsin Beyzadeoglu; Rustu Nuran; Baris Kocaoglu; Nuri Topsakal; Mehmet Akman; Mustafa Karahan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Artificial vascular models for endovascular training (3D printing).

Authors:  Inez Torres; Nelson De Luccia
Journal:  Innov Surg Sci       Date:  2018-08-11

6.  Training in Interventional Radiology: A Simulation-Based Approach.

Authors:  Indrajeet Mandal; Utkarsh Ojha
Journal:  J Med Educ Curric Dev       Date:  2020-04-13

7.  Mental rotation ability predicts the acquisition of basic endovascular skills.

Authors:  Katja I Paul; Annegret Glathe; Niels A Taatgen; Christopher J Steele; Arno Villringer; Peter Lanzer; Fokie Cnossen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.