Literature DB >> 17291249

Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III and squamous cell cervical carcinoma, and its correlation with clinicopathologic variables.

P Dursun1, K Yuce, A Usubutun, A Ayhan.   

Abstract

The objective of the study was to compare cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III (CIN III) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the cervix, and its correlation with clinicopathologic factors of SCC with a review of the available literature. This study included 25 patients with CIN III and 67 patients with stage I-IIa SCC. All patients in the SCC group were treated with radical hysterectomy plus pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy and postoperative chemoradiotherapy based on their histopathologic risk factors. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed on paraffin-embedded sections with COX-2 antibody. COX-2 expression in the SCC group was significantly higher than in the CIN III group (55.2% [37/67] vs 24% [6/25]; P= 0.008). Significantly higher expression of COX-2 was observed in patients with lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) compared to patients without LVSI (61.9% [34/55] vs 33.3% [3/9]; P= 0.02). Additionally, patients with tumor sizes >4 cm had significantly higher COX-2 expression than patients with tumor sizes <4 cm (65.9% [27/41] vs 39% [10/26] P= 0.028). There was no significant relationship with respect to COX-2 expression and parametrial involvement, lymph node metastasis, recurrences, and survival. In multivariate analysis, LVSI was the only statistically significant determinant for COX-2 expression (P= 0.024; OR = 2.35; 95% CI = 1.1-4.9). Our results and a review of the literature both suggest that COX-2 expression may have a role in the development and progression of CIN III and it is related to some clinicopathologic variables of cervical carcinoma. Further studies are needed to clarify the role of COX-2 inhibitors in the management of CIN and SCC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17291249     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.00798.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  5 in total

1.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization markers for prediction of cervical lymph node metastases.

Authors:  Darawalee Wangsa; Kerstin Heselmeyer-Haddad; Patricia Ried; Elina Eriksson; Alejandro A Schäffer; Larry E Morrison; Juhua Luo; Gert Auer; Eva Munck-Wikland; Thomas Ried; Elisabeth Avall Lundqvist
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 2.  Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents to induce regression and prevent the progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Shannon M Grabosch; Osman M Shariff; C William Helm
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-02-12

Review 3.  Medical treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II, III: an update review.

Authors:  Chumnan Kietpeerakool; Jatupol Srisomboon
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 3.850

4.  Expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in cervical cancer is associated with lymphovascular invasion.

Authors:  Friederike Hoellen; Annika Waldmann; Constanze Banz-Jansen; Achim Rody; Maria Heide; Frank Köster; Julika Ribbat-Idel; Christoph Thorns; Maximilian Gebhard; Martina Oberländer; Jens K Habermann; Marc Thill
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Combined COX-2/PPARγ Expression as Independent Negative Prognosticator for Vulvar Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Nadine Ansorge; Christian Dannecker; Udo Jeschke; Elisa Schmoeckel; Doris Mayr; Helene H Heidegger; Aurelia Vattai; Maximiliane Burgmann; Bastian Czogalla; Sven Mahner; Sophie Fuerst
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.