Literature DB >> 17290029

Effects of pioglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes with or without previous stroke: results from PROactive (PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events 04).

Robert Wilcox1, Marie-Germaine Bousser, D John Betteridge, Guntram Schernthaner, Valdis Pirags, Stuart Kupfer, John Dormandy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Diabetes is an important risk factor for stroke. We conducted analyses in patients who had entered the PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events (PROactive) with a history of stroke or without stroke.
METHODS: The prospective, double-blind PROactive (mean duration, 34.5 months) randomized 5238 patients with type 2 diabetes and a history of macrovascular disease to pioglitazone (titrated to 45 mg) or placebo, in addition to current diabetes and cardiovascular medications. Cardiovascular end-point events were independently adjudicated. This analysis evaluated the risk of stroke and other cardiovascular outcomes in patients with (n=984) and without (n=4254) prior stroke.
RESULTS: In patients with previous stroke (n=486 in the pioglitazone group and n=498 in the placebo group), there was a trend of benefit with pioglitazone for the primary end point of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, and cardiac intervention (including coronary artery bypass graft or percutaneous coronary intervention), stroke, major leg amputation, or bypass surgery or leg revascularization (hazard ratio[HR]=0.78, event rate=20.2% pioglitazone vs 25.3% placebo; 95% CI=0.60-1.02; P=0.0670) and for the main secondary end point of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke (HR=0.78, event rate=15.6% pioglitazone vs 19.7% placebo; 95% CI=0.58-1.06; P=0.1095). Pioglitazone reduced fatal or nonfatal stroke (HR=0.53, event rate=5.6% pioglitazone vs 10.2% placebo; 95% CI=0.34-0.85; P=0.0085) and cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke (HR=0.72, event rate=13.0% pioglitazone vs 17.7% placebo; 95% CI=0.52-1.00; P=0.0467). Higher event rates were observed in patients with prior stroke compared with those without prior stroke. In patients without prior stroke, no treatment effect was observed for a first stroke.
CONCLUSIONS: In a subgroup analysis from PROactive, pioglitazone reduced the risk of recurrent stroke significantly in high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17290029     DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000257974.06317.49

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  112 in total

1.  Inclusion of stroke as an outcome and risk equivalent in risk scores for primary and secondary prevention of vascular disease.

Authors:  Mandip S Dhamoon; Mitchell S V Elkind
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Update of secondary stroke prevention.

Authors:  Hans-Christoph Diener; Christian Weimar
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 5.992

3.  [European Stroke Organisation 2008 guidelines for managing acute cerebral infarction or transient ischemic attack : part 2].

Authors:  P D Schellinger; P Ringleb; W Hacke
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 4.  Exploration and Development of PPAR Modulators in Health and Disease: An Update of Clinical Evidence.

Authors:  Hong Sheng Cheng; Wei Ren Tan; Zun Siong Low; Charlie Marvalim; Justin Yin Hao Lee; Nguan Soon Tan
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Effect of pioglitazone and ramipril on biomarkers of low-grade inflammation and vascular function in nondiabetic patients with increased cardiovascular risk and an activated inflammation: results from the PIOace study.

Authors:  Andreas Pfützner; Markolf Hanefeld; Lida A Dekordi; Jürgen Müller; Iris Kleine; Winfried Fuchs; Thomas Forst
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-07-01

6.  Type 2 diabetes, thiazolidinediones, and cardiovascular risk.

Authors:  Clare Taylor; F D Richard Hobbs
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  [Antihyperglycemic treatment guidelines for diabetes mellitus type 2].

Authors:  Martin Clodi; Heidemarie Abrahamian; Heinz Drexel; Peter Fasching; Bernhard Föger; Claudia Francesconi; Friedrich Hoppichler; Susanne Kaser; Alexandra Kautzky-Willer; Monika Lechleitner; Bernhard Ludvik; Rudolf Prager; Elke Fröhlich-Reiterer; Michael Roden; Christoph Säly; Guntram Schernthaner; Harald Sourij; Hermann Toplak; Thomas C Wascher; Raimund Weitgasser
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 8.  Strategies for optimizing glycemic control and cardiovascular prognosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  James H O'Keefe; Mohammad Abuannadi; Carl J Lavie; David S H Bell
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 9.  Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease: Is intensive glucose control beneficial or deadly? Lessons from ACCORD, ADVANCE, VADT, UKPDS, PROactive, and NICE-SUGAR.

Authors:  Guntram Schernthaner
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2010-01

10.  Secondary prevention of stroke: Pleiotropic effects of optimal oral pharmacotherapy.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Kikuchi; Ko-Ichi Kawahara; Naoki Miura; Takashi Ito; Yoko Morimoto; Salunya Tancharoen; Nobuyuki Takeshige; Hisaaki Uchikado; Rokudai Sakamoto; Naohisa Miyagi; Chiemi Kikuchi; Narumi Iida; Naoto Shiomi; Terukazu Kuramoto; Masaru Hirohata; Ikuro Maruyama; Motohiro Morioka; Eiichiro Tanaka
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.