Literature DB >> 17289894

A phase 1 escalating single-dose and weekly fixed-dose study of cetuximab: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic rationale for dosing.

Paula M Fracasso1, Howard Burris, Matthew A Arquette, Ramaswamy Govindan, Feng Gao, Lisa P Wright, Sherry A Goodner, F Anthony Greco, Suzanne F Jones, Noel Willcut, Catherine Chodkiewicz, Amit Pathak, Gregory M Springett, George R Simon, Daniel M Sullivan, Raphaël Marcelpoil, Shelley D Mayfield, David Mauro, Christopher R Garrett.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This phase 1 study evaluated the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of cetuximab on patients with epithelial malignancies. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Following a skin and tumor biopsy, patients with advanced epithelial malignancies were randomized to receive a single dose of cetuximab at 50, 100, 250, 400, or 500 mg/m2 i.v. Repeat skin (days 2, 8, 15, and 22) and tumor (day 8) biopsies were obtained. Immunohistochemical expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and its pathway members was done on biopsies. Blood samples were obtained over 22 days for pharmacokinetic analyses. After day 22, all patients received weekly 250 mg/m2 cetuximab until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients enrolled. Rash was noted in 26 (67%) patients. Three patients (two with colon cancer and one with laryngeal cancer) achieved a partial response and 13 patients had stable disease. Pharmacokinetic data revealed mean maximum observed cetuximab concentrations and mean area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity increased in a dose-dependent manner up to 400 mg/m2 cetuximab. Mean clearance was similar at cetuximab doses>or=100 mg/m2, supporting saturation of EGFR binding at 250 mg/m2. Pharmacodynamic evaluation revealed that patients with partial response/stable disease had a higher-grade rash and higher cetuximab trough levels than those with progressive disease (P=0.032 and 0.002, respectively). Administration of single doses (250-500 mg/m2) of cetuximab resulted in a dose-dependent decrease in EGFR protein expression levels in skin over time, supporting a minimal dose of cetuximab at 250 mg/m2 for a pharmacodynamic effect.
CONCLUSION: This study provides a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic rationale for the dosing of cetuximab.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17289894     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  49 in total

1.  A dose-escalation phase I trial of nimotuzumab, an antibody against the epidermal growth factor receptor, in patients with advanced solid malignancies.

Authors:  Benoit You; Anthony Brade; Joao M Magalhaes; Lillian L Siu; Amit Oza; Sonya Lovell; Lisa Wang; David W Hedley; Leonardo V Nicacio; Eric X Chen
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic perspectives on the clinical drug development of panitumumab.

Authors:  Bing-Bing Yang; Peggy Lum; Alin Chen; Rosalin Arends; Lorin Roskos; Brian Smith; Juan José Pérez Ruixo
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Pharmacokinetics of Irinotecan, Oxaliplatin and 5-Fluorouracil During Hepatic Artery Chronomodulated Infusion: A Translational European OPTILIV Study.

Authors:  Francis Lévi; Abdoulaye Karaboué; Marie-Christine Etienne-Grimaldi; Gilles Paintaud; Christian Focan; Pasquale Innominato; Mohamed Bouchahda; Gérard Milano; Etienne Chatelut
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  A fibronectin scaffold approach to bispecific inhibitors of epidermal growth factor receptor and insulin-like growth factor-I receptor.

Authors:  Stuart L Emanuel; Linda J Engle; Ginger Chao; Rong-Rong Zhu; Carolyn Cao; Zheng Lin; Aaron P Yamniuk; Jennifer Hosbach; Jennifer Brown; Elizabeth Fitzpatrick; Jochem Gokemeijer; Paul Morin; Brent A Morse; Irvith M Carvajal; David Fabrizio; Martin C Wright; Ruchira Das Gupta; Michael Gosselin; Daniel Cataldo; Rolf P Ryseck; Michael L Doyle; Tai W Wong; Raymond T Camphausen; Sharon T Cload; H Nicholas Marsh; Marco M Gottardis; Eric S Furfine
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 5.857

5.  Pharmacokinetics and toxicology of therapeutic proteins: Advances and challenges.

Authors:  Yulia Vugmeyster; Xin Xu; Frank-Peter Theil; Leslie A Khawli; Michael W Leach
Journal:  World J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-04-26

6.  Antigen-specific proteolysis by hybrid antibodies containing promiscuous proteolytic light chains paired with an antigen-binding heavy chain.

Authors:  Gopal Sapparapu; Stephanie A Planque; Yasuhiro Nishiyama; Steven K Foung; Sudhir Paul
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Physiologically-based modeling to predict the clinical behavior of monoclonal antibodies directed against lymphocyte antigens.

Authors:  Patrick M Glassman; Joseph P Balthasar
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 5.857

8.  The distribution of the therapeutic monoclonal antibodies cetuximab and trastuzumab within solid tumors.

Authors:  Carol M Lee; Ian F Tannock
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Current status of treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer with special reference to cetuximab and elderly patients.

Authors:  Per Pfeiffer; Camilla Qvortrup; Jon K Bjerregaard
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Treatment of pancreatic cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted therapy.

Authors:  Bryan A Faller; Barbara Burtness
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2009-09-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.