Literature DB >> 17289290

Uncertainties in assessment of the vaginal dose for intracavitary brachytherapy of cervical cancer using a tandem-ring applicator.

Daniel Berger1, Johannes Dimopoulos, Petra Georg, Dietmar Georg, Richard Pötter, Christian Kirisits.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The vagina has not been widely recognized as organ at risk in brachytherapy for cervical cancer. No widely accepted dose parameters are available. This study analyzes the uncertainties in dose reporting for the vaginal wall using tandem-ring applicators. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Organ wall contours were delineated on axial magnetic resonance (MR) slices to perform dose-volume histogram (DVH) analysis. Different DVH parameters were used in a feasibility study based on 40 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based treatment plans of different cervical cancer patients. Dose to the most irradiated, 0.1 cm(3), 1 cm(3), 2 cm(3), and at defined points on the ring surface and at 5-mm tissue depth were reported. Treatment-planning systems allow different methods of dose point definition. Film dosimetry was used to verify the maximum dose at the surface of the ring applicator in an experimental setup.
RESULTS: Dose reporting for the vagina is extremely sensitive to geometrical uncertainties with variations of 25% for 1 mm shifts. Accurate delineation of the vaginal wall is limited by the finite pixel size of MRI and available treatment-planning systems. No significant correlation was found between dose-point and dose-volume parameters. The DVH parameters were often related to noncontiguous volumes and were not able to detect very different situations of spatial dose distributions inside the vaginal wall. Deviations between measured and calculated doses were up to 21%.
CONCLUSIONS: Reporting either point dose values or DVH parameters for the vaginal wall is based on high inaccuracies because of contouring and geometric positioning. Therefore, the use of prospective dose constraints for individual treatment plans is not to be recommended at present. However, for large patient groups treated within one protocol correlation with vaginal morbidity can be evaluated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17289290     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.11.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  6 in total

1.  MRI-based pre-planning in patients with cervical cancer treated with three-dimensional brachytherapy.

Authors:  M Dolezel; K Odrazka; J Vanasek; T Kohlova; T Kroulik; K Kudelka; D Spitzer; M Mrklovsky; M Tichy; J Zizka; L Jalcova
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Comparison of catheter reconstruction techniques for the lunar ovoid channels of the VeneziaTM applicator.

Authors:  Jon Hansen; David Dunkerley; Kristin Bradley; Jessica Miller; Jessie Huang
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2020-08-21

3.  A detailed dosimetric comparison between manual and inverse plans in HDR intracavitary/interstitial cervical cancer brachytherapy.

Authors:  Petra Trnková; Dimos Baltas; Andreas Karabis; Markus Stock; Johannes Dimopoulos; Dietmar Georg; Richard Pötter; Christian Kirisits
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2011-01-14

4.  Vaginal dose of radical radiotherapy for cervical cancer in China: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Juan Wang; Kai-Shuo Zhang; Tao Wang; Zi Liu; Rui-Hua Wang; Fu-Quan Zhang; Lang Yu; Li Ran; Jian-Li He; Ya-Li Wang; Li-Chun Wei; Mei Shi; Guo-Qing Wang; Chao-Qun Wu; Qi-Jun Kang; Jie Yang; Sha Li; Fei-Yue Yang; Bao-Gang Liu; Juan-Yue Liu; Fan Shi; Jin Su; Wei Yuan; Emmanuel Kwateng Drokow
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Quality Assurance Procedures based on Dosimetric, Gamma Analysis as a Fast Reliable Tool for Commissioning Brachytherapy Treatment Planning Systems.

Authors:  Grzegorz Zwierzchowski; Grzegorz Bieleda; Janusz Skowronek
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Dosimetric comparison of two different applicators and rectal retraction methods used in inverse optimization-based intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Fatih Biltekin; Melis Gultekin; Melek Tugce Yilmaz; Ferah Yildiz
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2020-02-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.