Literature DB >> 17288696

Resource utilization in asthma: combined fluticasone propionate/salmeterol compared with inhaled corticosteroids.

Howard S Friedman1, Barbara P Yawn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Asthma management guidelines recommend low-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for initial treatment of mild persistent asthma. Instead, data from primary care practice show that many patients start on combination therapy with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FPS) for mild asthma. The consequences of this variance from guideline recommendations are not well described.
OBJECTIVE: Compare healthcare utilization and asthma-related outcomes for patients with mild asthma who began treatment with FPS or ICS alone. Design and data source: A retrospective analysis of asthma-related insurance claims. Patients initially treated with FPS or ICS were identified from an administrative health insurance claims database and followed for 1 year. Analyses of resource utilization 6 months before therapy initiation identified patients with mild asthma. Propensity score matching managed between-group differences in clinical characteristics and controlled for selection bias. OUTCOME MEASURES: Resource use was determined for asthma-related outpatient visits, emergency room services, hospitalizations, and medications.
RESULTS: Demographic characteristics and comorbidities were similar for each group (FPS, n = 1888; ICS, n = 1888). During the 12-month follow-up period, total asthma-related costs were significantly higher for FPS versus ICS (1206 vs. 804 dollars; p < 0.0001), owing primarily to significantly higher drug costs for FPS versus ICS (677 vs. 357 dollars; p < 0.0001). The percentage of patients experiencing an exacerbation (14.0% FPS, 13.5% ICS) and the average number of exacerbations in each group (0.175 FPS, 0.164 ICS) were similar.
CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare costs were found to be lower in patients receiving ICS than in those receiving FPS, with similar health outcomes in both groups. Study limitations included the use of claims data and a proxy definition of asthma severity, and potential confounding by unobserved factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17288696     DOI: 10.1185/030079906X167417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  5 in total

1.  The impact of adherence and disease control on resource use and charges in patients with mild asthma managed on inhaled corticosteroid agents.

Authors:  P Navaratnam; H S Friedman; E Urdaneta
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 2.711

2.  Fixed-Dose Combination Drug Approvals, Patents and Market Exclusivities Compared to Single Active Ingredient Pharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Jing Hao; Rosa Rodriguez-Monguio; Enrique Seoane-Vazquez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Electronic health record-based assessment of oral corticosteroid use in a population of primary care patients with asthma: an observational study.

Authors:  Felicia C Allen-Ramey; Linda M Nelsen; Joseph B Leader; Dione Mercer; Henry Lester Kirchner; James B Jones
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 3.406

Review 4.  Long-acting beta-agonists plus inhaled corticosteroids safety: a systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized studies.

Authors:  Gimena Hernández; Mónica Avila; Angels Pont; Olatz Garin; Jordi Alonso; Laurent Laforest; Christopher J Cates; Montserrat Ferrer
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2014-07-19

Review 5.  Assessing asthma severity based on claims data: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christian Jacob; Jennifer S Haas; Benno Bechtel; Peter Kardos; Sebastian Braun
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2016-03-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.