Literature DB >> 17288684

Mistiming of intercourse as a primary cause of failure to conceive: results of a survey on use of a home-use fertility monitor.

Janet E Robinson1, Jayne E Ellis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess demographics, fecundity characteristics and fertility history of couples who successfully conceived using a home-use Fertility Monitor. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a retrospective US observational study of couples who successfully conceived using a Fertility Monitor. Data were self-reported by volunteers using a questionnaire supplied and collected by mail. Of 276 surveys distributed, 196 (71.0%) were returned and evaluated.
RESULTS: Length of time trying to conceive was < 12 months for 70% of women; proportions were similar across age groupings. After switching to the Fertility Monitor, 49.5% and 91.9% of women had conceived within first and third cycles, respectively. Prior to Fertility Monitor use, conception aids were used by 84.2% and 64.3% had consulted a physician to seek help in attempting to conceive. Average costs of prior treatment were (in US dollars) 6637 dollars; median costs for infertility evaluation were 1075 dollars per cycle. Fertility Monitor costs ranged from 250 dollars for one cycle to 550 dollars after 10 cycles.
CONCLUSIONS: A probable cause for failure to conceive appeared to be mistiming of intercourse. The issue of early intervention with tests and medications were highlighted, resulting in escalating costs and strain on the couple. The use of a home Fertility Monitor that identifies all fertile days of the cycle and allows couples to target intercourse accordingly, should be considered as an alternative choice for couples seeking to conceive during the first year, before other attempts at infertility diagnosis are made, unless there are conflicting clinical reasons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17288684     DOI: 10.1185/030079906X162863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  5 in total

1.  Cervical mucus monitoring prevalence and associated fecundability in women trying to conceive.

Authors:  Emily Evans-Hoeker; David A Pritchard; D Leann Long; Amy H Herring; Joseph B Stanford; Anne Z Steiner
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Women's experiences of ovulation testing: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Georgina Jones; Jill Carlton; Sarah Weddell; Sarah Johnson; William L Ledger
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.223

3.  Wearable Sensors Reveal Menses-Driven Changes in Physiology and Enable Prediction of the Fertile Window: Observational Study.

Authors:  Brianna Mae Goodale; Mohaned Shilaih; Lisa Falco; Franziska Dammeier; Györgyi Hamvas; Brigitte Leeners
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Home ovulation test use and stress during subfertility evaluation: Subarm of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sarah Weddell; Georgina L Jones; Sheila Duffy; Cameron Hogg; Sarah Johnson; William Ledger
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec

5.  Home ovulation tests and stress in women trying to conceive: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  S Tiplady; G Jones; M Campbell; S Johnson; W Ledger
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 6.918

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.