BACKGROUND: The acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with 16% is one of the most common indication for emergency missions. Care of ACS patients in the Heidelberg emergency service region has been carried out since the beginning of 2005 following an interdisciplinary developed concept based on the current guidelines of the German Society for Cardiology (DGK), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Resuscitation Council (ERC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Evaluation of the emergency diagnostic and therapeutic measures for the diagnosis of ACS before and after the introduction of the ACS care concept, was carried out retrospectively for the years 2004 (group 1) and 2005 (group 2) by electronic data processing of the records stored in the emergency medical services documentaion system (NADOK). RESULTS: In the years 2004 before (group 1, n=633) and 2005 after (group 2, n=628) introduction of the ACS care concept, there was a comparable basic diagnostic consisting of a 3-lead electrocardiogram (ECG; 95 versus 97%), manual blood pressure measurement (93 versus 95%) and pulse oxymetry (94 versus 91%) as well as a comparable proportion of patients who received a peripheral vene access (99 versus 100%). There were no significant differences between the two groups. However, after the introduction of the ACS concept, the 12-lead ECG was used significantly more often (49 versus 71%, p=0.0001). Furthermore, a guideline-conform medicinal treatment of ACS patients was used inceasingly more often for anticoagulation with heparin/acetylsalicylic acid (75 versus 84%,p=0.0001) and the use of beta-receptor blockers (32 versus 39%, p=0.009) after introduction of the ACS concept. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of a regional care concept leads to an optimisation of guideline-conform prehospital treatment for ACS patients.
BACKGROUND: The acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with 16% is one of the most common indication for emergency missions. Care of ACS patients in the Heidelberg emergency service region has been carried out since the beginning of 2005 following an interdisciplinary developed concept based on the current guidelines of the German Society for Cardiology (DGK), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Resuscitation Council (ERC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Evaluation of the emergency diagnostic and therapeutic measures for the diagnosis of ACS before and after the introduction of the ACS care concept, was carried out retrospectively for the years 2004 (group 1) and 2005 (group 2) by electronic data processing of the records stored in the emergency medical services documentaion system (NADOK). RESULTS: In the years 2004 before (group 1, n=633) and 2005 after (group 2, n=628) introduction of the ACS care concept, there was a comparable basic diagnostic consisting of a 3-lead electrocardiogram (ECG; 95 versus 97%), manual blood pressure measurement (93 versus 95%) and pulse oxymetry (94 versus 91%) as well as a comparable proportion of patients who received a peripheral vene access (99 versus 100%). There were no significant differences between the two groups. However, after the introduction of the ACS concept, the 12-lead ECG was used significantly more often (49 versus 71%, p=0.0001). Furthermore, a guideline-conform medicinal treatment of ACS patients was used inceasingly more often for anticoagulation with heparin/acetylsalicylic acid (75 versus 84%,p=0.0001) and the use of beta-receptor blockers (32 versus 39%, p=0.009) after introduction of the ACS concept. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of a regional care concept leads to an optimisation of guideline-conform prehospital treatment for ACS patients.
Authors: P Widimský; T Budesínský; D Vorác; L Groch; M Zelízko; M Aschermann; M Branny; J St'ásek; P Formánek Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Elliott M Antman; Daniel T Anbe; Paul Wayne Armstrong; Eric R Bates; Lee A Green; Mary Hand; Judith S Hochman; Harlan M Krumholz; Frederick G Kushner; Gervasio A Lamas; Charles J Mullany; Joseph P Ornato; David L Pearle; Michael A Sloan; Sidney C Smith; Joseph S Alpert; Jeffrey L Anderson; David P Faxon; Valentin Fuster; Raymond J Gibbons; Gabriel Gregoratos; Jonathan L Halperin; Loren F Hiratzka; Sharon Ann Hunt; Alice K Jacobs Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-08-03 Impact factor: 29.690