Literature DB >> 17287858

Rare CBFB-MYH11 fusion transcripts in AML with inv(16)/t(16;16) are associated with therapy-related AML M4eo, atypical cytomorphology, atypical immunophenotype, atypical additional chromosomal rearrangements and low white blood cell count: a study on 162 patients.

S Schnittger1, U Bacher, C Haferlach, W Kern, T Haferlach.   

Abstract

The spectrum of CBFB-MYH11 fusion transcripts in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) M4eo with inv(16)/t(16;16) is heterogeneous. Approximately 85% show type A CBFB-MYH11 fusion transcripts. In addition, more than 10 different fusion transcripts have been reported. The prognostic impact and biological background of rare fusion transcripts remain open. In this study, a molecular characterization of CBFB-MYH11 transcripts in 162 patients with CBFB-MYH11 positive AML at diagnosis was performed. In total, 128 patients (79.0%) showed the fusion transcript type A, whereas nine different rare CBFB-MYH11 fusion genes were detected in 34 cases (21.0%). Rare fusion transcripts were found more frequently in therapy-related AML (P=0.0106). Numerical gains of the chromosomes 8, 21 and 22 were more frequently associated with type A (28.3%) than with rare fusions (12.9%) (P=0.012). Median white blood cell (WBC) count was higher in type A (35.4 G/l; range=1.1-279 G/l) than in cases with rare types (7.8 G/l; range=0.8-148.0 G/l) (P<0.0001). Rare fusion transcripts were correlated with an atypical cytomorphology not primarily suggestive for the FAB subtype M4eo (P=0.0203). Immunophenotype revealed lower CD2, CD13, CD33 and CD90 levels than in type A fusion cases (P=0.036, 0.002, 0.029 and 0.045, respectively). However, the type of fusion was not an independent prognostic parameter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17287858     DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leukemia        ISSN: 0887-6924            Impact factor:   11.528


  15 in total

1.  Childhood acute myeloid leukemia with bone marrow eosinophilia caused by t(16;21)(q24;q22).

Authors:  Nozomu Kawashima; Akira Shimada; Takeshi Taketani; Yasuhide Hayashi; Nao Yoshida; Kimikazu Matsumoto; Yoshiyuki Takahashi; Seiji Kojima; Koji Kato
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 2.  Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms: pathobiology and clinical characteristics.

Authors:  H Sill; W Olipitz; A Zebisch; E Schulz; A Wölfler
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 3.  A focused review of hematopoietic neoplasms occurring in the therapy-related setting.

Authors:  Liping Zhang; Sa A Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-06-15

Review 4.  Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms - what have we learned so far?

Authors:  Mohammad Faizan Zahid; Aric Parnes; Bipin N Savani; Mark R Litzow; Shahrukh K Hashmi
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 5.326

5.  CBFB-MYH11/RUNX1 together with a compendium of hematopoietic regulators, chromatin modifiers and basal transcription factors occupies self-renewal genes in inv(16) acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  A Mandoli; A A Singh; P W T C Jansen; A T J Wierenga; H Riahi; G Franci; K Prange; S Saeed; E Vellenga; M Vermeulen; H G Stunnenberg; J H A Martens
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 11.528

6.  inv(16)/t(16;16) acute myeloid leukemia with non-type A CBFB-MYH11 fusions associate with distinct clinical and genetic features and lack KIT mutations.

Authors:  Sebastian Schwind; Colin G Edwards; Deedra Nicolet; Krzysztof Mrózek; Kati Maharry; Yue-Zhong Wu; Peter Paschka; Ann-Kathrin Eisfeld; Pia Hoellerbauer; Heiko Becker; Klaus H Metzeler; John Curfman; Jessica Kohlschmidt; Thomas W Prior; Jonathan E Kolitz; William Blum; Mark J Pettenati; Paola Dal Cin; Andrew J Carroll; Michael A Caligiuri; Richard A Larson; Stefano Volinia; Guido Marcucci; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Survival is poorer in patients with secondary core-binding factor acute myelogenous leukemia compared with de novo core-binding factor leukemia.

Authors:  Gautam Borthakur; E Lin; Nitin Jain; Elihu E Estey; Jorge E Cortes; Susan O'Brien; Stefan Faderl; Farhad Ravandi; Sherry Pierce; Hagop Kantarjian
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 8.  Advances in molecular genetics and treatment of core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Krzysztof Mrózek; Guido Marcucci; Peter Paschka; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.645

9.  Characteristics of hematologic malignancies with coexisting t(9;22) and inv(16) chromosomal abnormalities.

Authors:  Eunhee Han; Hyeyoung Lee; Myungshin Kim; Yonggoo Kim; Kyungja Han; Sung-Eun Lee; Hee-Je Kim; Dong-Wook Kim
Journal:  Blood Res       Date:  2014-03-24

Review 10.  Therapy-related acute myelogenous leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  Gautam Borthakur; And Elihu E Estey
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.