Literature DB >> 17287327

A prospective, randomized, double-blind study of vaginal microflora and epithelium in women using a tampon with an apertured film cover compared with those in women using a commercial tampon with a cover of nonwoven fleece.

David J Chase1, Berenike P Schenkel, Anne-Marie Fahr, Ulrich Eigner.   

Abstract

Healthy women with normal menstrual cycles were randomly assigned to use either a test tampon during cycle 1 and a reference tampon during cycle 2 or a reference tampon during cycle 1 and a test tampon during cycle 2. Tampons were identical except for their cover materials: apertured film for the test tampon and nonwoven fleece for the reference tampon. Product use was doubly blinded. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of vaginal cultures were done pre-, mid-, and postmenstrually for a broad panel of microorganisms, colposcopy was performed, and diary reports were collected; 101 of 105 enrolled subjects completed the study. Midmenstrual findings for a variety of organisms differed from pre- and postmenstrual observations whether subjects were using test or reference tampons. No statistically significant differences were noted in prevalence or colony counts at premenstrual versus mid- and postmenstrual visits for most microorganisms. Prevalences of Gardnerella and anaerobic gram-negative rods were significantly different between tampons at the premenstrual visit, when unusually low values were observed for the test and reference tampons, respectively. None of the changes or differences in microflora were considered to be clinically significant. It is noteworthy, however, that declines in the prevalence and abundance of Lactobacillus during the menstrual periods were less pronounced during the use of both test and reference tampons than those reported from previous studies. Colposcopy showed no abnormal findings with either tampon and no changes in vaginal or cervical epithelial integrity. Thus, all evidence from both microbiological and colposcopic evaluations indicates that the apertured film cover of the test tampon is as safe as the nonwoven cover of the reference tampon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17287327      PMCID: PMC1865837          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02156-06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  17 in total

1.  Influence of the normal menstrual cycle on vaginal tissue, discharge, and microflora.

Authors:  D A Eschenbach; S S Thwin; D L Patton; T M Hooton; A E Stapleton; K Agnew; C Winter; A Meier; W E Stamm
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2000-06-13       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Tampon safety. TSS now rare, but women still should take care.

Authors:  M Meadows
Journal:  FDA Consum       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr

3.  A mixed effects model for multivariate ordinal response data including correlated discrete failure times with ordinal responses.

Authors:  T R Ten Have
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Population-averaged and cluster-specific models for clustered ordinal response data.

Authors:  T R Ten Have; J R Landis; J Hartzel
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-12-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Qualitative assessment of vaginal microflora during use of tampons of various compositions.

Authors:  A B Onderdonk; G R Zamarchi; M L Rodriguez; M L Hirsch; A Muñoz; E H Kass
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Performance of generalized estimating equations in practical situations.

Authors:  S R Lipsitz; G M Fitzmaurice; E J Orav; N M Laird
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation.

Authors:  R P Nugent; M A Krohn; S L Hillier
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparison of the effects of different menstrual tampons on the vaginal epithelium: a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  D Raudrant; G Landrivon; L Frappart; P De Haas; F Champion; R Ecochard
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.435

9.  The normal vaginal flora, H2O2-producing lactobacilli, and bacterial vaginosis in pregnant women.

Authors:  S L Hillier; M A Krohn; L K Rabe; S J Klebanoff; D A Eschenbach
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Quantitative assessment of vaginal microflora during use of tampons of various compositions.

Authors:  A B Onderdonk; G R Zamarchi; M L Rodriguez; M L Hirsch; A Muñoz; E H Kass
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  5 in total

1.  Randomized, double-blind crossover study of vaginal microflora and epithelium in women using a tampon with a "winged" apertured film cover and a commercial tampon with a nonwoven fleece cover.

Authors:  David J Chase; Berenike P Schenkel; Anne-Marie Fahr; Ulrich Eigner
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Vaginal microbiota of adolescent girls prior to the onset of menarche resemble those of reproductive-age women.

Authors:  Roxana J Hickey; Xia Zhou; Matthew L Settles; Julie Erb; Kristin Malone; Melanie A Hansmann; Marcia L Shew; Barbara Van Der Pol; J Dennis Fortenberry; Larry J Forney
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 7.867

3.  Impact of Advertising on Tampon Wear-time Practices.

Authors:  Kara E Woeller; Kenneth W Miller; Amy L Robertson-Smith; Lisa C Bohman
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Womens Health       Date:  2015-11-29

4.  Association of characteristics of tampon use with menstrual toxic shock syndrome in France.

Authors:  Amaury Billon; Marie-Paule Gustin; Anne Tristan; Thomas Bénet; Julien Berthiller; Claude Alexandre Gustave; Philippe Vanhems; Gerard Lina
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2020-03-10

5.  A Multi-Country Cross-Sectional Study of Vaginal Carriage of Group B Streptococci (GBS) and Escherichia coli in Resource-Poor Settings: Prevalences and Risk Factors.

Authors:  Piet Cools; Vicky Jespers; Liselotte Hardy; Tania Crucitti; Sinead Delany-Moretlwe; Mary Mwaura; Gilles F Ndayisaba; Janneke H H M van de Wijgert; Mario Vaneechoutte
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.