Literature DB >> 17287049

ADP-ribosylation activity in pertussis vaccines and its relationship to the in vivo histamine-sensitisation test.

S R Gomez1, C-T Yuen, C Asokanathan, A Douglas-Bardsley, M J Corbel, J G Coote, R Parton, D K L Xing.   

Abstract

Pertussis toxin (PTx) is a major virulence factor produced by Bordetella pertussis. In its detoxified form (PTd), it is an important component of acellular pertussis vaccines although some residual PTx activity may likely be present because of the limitations of the detoxification processes used. Furthermore, different detoxification procedures have been shown to result in different amino acid side-chain modifications for the resulting PTd. The histamine-sensitisation test (HIST) in mice is currently used for the safety testing of these vaccines. However, an alternative test is needed because of large assay variability and ethical concerns. The ADP-ribosylation enzyme activity of PTx is thought to be the major factor responsible for the histamine-sensitising activity detected in vivo. In the present study, the ADP-ribosylation activity in different acellular pertussis-based combination vaccine formulations was measured and compared with reactivity in the HIST. The results indicated that different products showed differences in ADP-ribosylation activity and a level which would be significant in relation to the reactivity seen in the HIST could not be defined, except for vaccines that contain genetically detoxified PTx, which do not have enzymatic activity nor in vivo toxicity. Different detoxification procedures as well as formulation factors could contribute to this variation. Relying solely on the residual enzyme activity of PTx in vaccines containing chemically detoxified PTd may not fully reflect the in vivo reactivity observed by the HIST. Refinement of the in vitro test to include a step which monitors the B-subunit activity of PTx may provide a better correlation with the in vivo HIST.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17287049     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  6 in total

1.  Antibodies recognizing protective pertussis toxin epitopes are preferentially elicited by natural infection versus acellular immunization.

Authors:  Jamie N Sutherland; Christine Chang; Sandra M Yoder; Michael T Rock; Jennifer A Maynard
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2011-04-20

2.  Confocal microscopy study of pertussis toxin and toxoids on CHO-cells.

Authors:  Yajun Tan; Roland A Fleck; Catpagavalli Asokanathan; Chun-Ting Yuen; Dorothy Xing; Shumin Zhang; Junzhi Wang
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Investigation in a murine model of possible mechanisms of enhanced local reactions to post-primary diphtheria-tetanus toxoid boosters in recipients of acellular pertussis-diphtheria-tetanus vaccine.

Authors:  Masaki Ochiai; Yoshinobu Horiuchi; Chun-Ting Yuen; Catpagavalli Asokanathan; Akihiko Yamamoto; Kenji Okada; Michiyo Kataoka; Kevin Markey; Michael Corbel; Dorothy Xing
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Assays for Determining Pertussis Toxin Activity in Acellular Pertussis Vaccines.

Authors:  Kevin Markey; Catpagavalli Asokanathan; Ian Feavers
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 4.546

Review 5.  In Vivo Models and In Vitro Assays for the Assessment of Pertussis Toxin Activity.

Authors:  Marieke Esther Hoonakker
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 4.546

Review 6.  Non-primate animal models for pertussis: back to the drawing board?

Authors:  Nevio Cimolai
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 4.813

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.