Literature DB >> 17286722

Seven reasons why health professionals search clinical information-retrieval technology (CIRT): toward an organizational model.

Pierre Pluye1, Roland M Grad, Martin Dawes, Joan C Bartlett.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND AIM: Clinical Information-Retrieval Technology (CIRT) is increasingly used, for example in accessing drug databases. However, no comprehensive framework exists to understand why health professionals search for information using CIRT. The present article aims to propose such organizational framework.
BACKGROUND: Our literature review suggests six reasons, of which three refer to cognitive objectives (C1, C2, C3) and three to organizational objectives (O1, O2, O3): (C1) to answer-solve-support a clinical question-problem-decision; (C2) to fulfil an educational-research objective; (C3) to search in general or for curiosity; (O1) to share information with patients; (O2) to exchange information with other health professionals; (O3) to plan-manage-monitor tasks with other health professionals.
METHODS: The case study examined the use and impact of the InfoRetriever software on handheld computers in a Canadian family practice centre. Using the Critical Incident Technique, six family doctors were interviewed on specific events. A thematic analysis assigned extracts of interviews to reasons for use. FINDINGS AND
CONCLUSION: Findings illustrate the six reasons, and suggest a seventh reason that refers to a cognitive objective, namely (C4) to overcome the limits of health professional memory. These seven reasons are interpreted according to the literature on information science and organization studies, which suggest ordering reasons at three levels of stimulation of learning and knowledge: none (objective not achieved), moderate (cognitive objective achieved), and high (organizational objective achieved). This paves the way toward a new evaluation of relevance of CIRT in everyday practice (judgement based on professionals' objective achievement) using an organizational model of information-retrieving processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17286722     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00646.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract        ISSN: 1356-1294            Impact factor:   2.431


  7 in total

Review 1.  A new impact assessment method to evaluate knowledge resources.

Authors:  Pierre Pluye; Roland M Grad; Randolph Stephenson; Lynn G Dunikowski
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2005

2.  Cognitive impact assessment of electronic knowledge resources: a mixed methods evaluation study of a handheld prototype.

Authors:  Pierre Pluye; Roland M Grad
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

3.  Factors motivating and affecting health information exchange usage.

Authors:  Joshua R Vest; Hongwei Zhao; Jon Jasperson; Jon Jaspserson; Larry D Gamm; Robert L Ohsfeldt
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Health information exchange and healthcare utilization.

Authors:  Joshua R Vest
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.460

5.  Systematically assessing the situational relevance of electronic knowledge resources: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Pierre Pluye; Roland M Grad; Naveen Mysore; Loes Knaapen; Janique Johnson-Lafleur; Martin Dawes
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Do family physicians retrieve synopses of clinical research previously read as email alerts?

Authors:  Roland Grad; Pierre Pluye; Janique Johnson-Lafleur; Vera Granikov; Michael Shulha; Gillian Bartlett; Bernard Marlow
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  In pursuit of a valid Information Assessment Method for continuing education: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Soumya Bindiganavile Sridhar; Pierre Pluye; Roland Grad
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 2.463

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.