Literature DB >> 17286462

Efficient global biopolymer sampling with end-transfer configurational bias Monte Carlo.

Gaurav Arya1, Tamar Schlick.   

Abstract

We develop an "end-transfer configurational bias Monte Carlo" method for efficient thermodynamic sampling of complex biopolymers and assess its performance on a mesoscale model of chromatin (oligonucleosome) at different salt conditions compared to other Monte Carlo moves. Our method extends traditional configurational bias by deleting a repeating motif (monomer) from one end of the biopolymer and regrowing it at the opposite end using the standard Rosenbluth scheme. The method's sampling efficiency compared to local moves, pivot rotations, and standard configurational bias is assessed by parameters relating to translational, rotational, and internal degrees of freedom of the oligonucleosome. Our results show that the end-transfer method is superior in sampling every degree of freedom of the oligonucleosomes over other methods at high salt concentrations (weak electrostatics) but worse than the pivot rotations in terms of sampling internal and rotational sampling at low-to-moderate salt concentrations (strong electrostatics). Under all conditions investigated, however, the end-transfer method is several orders of magnitude more efficient than the standard configurational bias approach. This is because the characteristic sampling time of the innermost oligonucleosome motif scales quadratically with the length of the oligonucleosomes for the end-transfer method while it scales exponentially for the traditional configurational-bias method. Thus, the method we propose can significantly improve performance for global biomolecular applications, especially in condensed systems with weak nonbonded interactions and may be combined with local enhancements to improve local sampling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17286462     DOI: 10.1063/1.2428305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  13 in total

1.  The effect of linker histone's nucleosome binding affinity on chromatin unfolding mechanisms.

Authors:  Rosana Collepardo-Guevara; Tamar Schlick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Large-scale simulations of nucleoprotein complexes: ribosomes, nucleosomes, chromatin, chromosomes and CRISPR.

Authors:  Karissa Y Sanbonmatsu
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 6.809

3.  Chromatin Fiber Folding Directed by Cooperative Histone Tail Acetylation and Linker Histone Binding.

Authors:  Gavin D Bascom; Tamar Schlick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Kilobase Pair Chromatin Fiber Contacts Promoted by Living-System-Like DNA Linker Length Distributions and Nucleosome Depletion.

Authors:  Gavin D Bascom; Taejin Kim; Tamar Schlick
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 2.991

5.  Modeling studies of chromatin fiber structure as a function of DNA linker length.

Authors:  Ognjen Perišić; Rosana Collepardo-Guevara; Tamar Schlick
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  A tale of tails: how histone tails mediate chromatin compaction in different salt and linker histone environments.

Authors:  Gaurav Arya; Tamar Schlick
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 2.781

7.  Monte Carlo, harmonic approximation, and coarse-graining approaches for enhanced sampling of biomolecular structure.

Authors:  Tamar Schlick
Journal:  F1000 Biol Rep       Date:  2009-06-29

8.  Computer modeling reveals that modifications of the histone tail charges define salt-dependent interaction of the nucleosome core particles.

Authors:  Ye Yang; Alexander P Lyubartsev; Nikolay Korolev; Lars Nordenskiöld
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Mesoscale Modeling Reveals Hierarchical Looping of Chromatin Fibers Near Gene Regulatory Elements.

Authors:  Gavin D Bascom; Karissa Y Sanbonmatsu; Tamar Schlick
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  Probing the elasticity of DNA on short length scales by modeling supercoiling under tension.

Authors:  Robert Schöpflin; Hergen Brutzer; Oliver Müller; Ralf Seidel; Gero Wedemann
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.