BACKGROUND: Identification of specific chromosomal translocations is essential for the diagnosis and prognosis of leukemia. In this study, we employ DNA microarray technology to detect chromosomal aberrations in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML), as well as in leukemic cell lines. METHODS: Reverse transcription using a random 9-mer primer was performed with total RNA from patients and leukemic cells lines. Multiplex PCR reactions using four groups of primer sets were then performed for amplification of cDNA from reverse-transcribed total RNA samples. Normal and fusion sequences were distinguished by hybridization of the amplified cDNA to a selective oligonucleotide array (SOA) containing 20-30mer synthetic probes. A total of 23 sets of oligomers were fabricated on glass slides for the detection of normal and fusion genes, as follows: BCR/ABL, AML/EAP, AML/ETO, AML/MDS, PML/RARA, NUMA1/RARA, PLZF/RARA, and CBFB/MYH. RESULTS: Gene translocation in leukemia was effectively identified with the SOA containing various leukemia-specific fusion and normal control sequences. Leukemic fusion sequences from patients and cell lines hybridized specifically to their complementary probes. The probe sets differing by approximately 50% at their 5' or 3' ends could distinguish between normal and fusion sequences. The entire process of detection was completed within 8 hours using the SOA method. CONCLUSIONS: Probe sets on SOA can effectively discriminate between leukemia-specific fusion and normal sequences with a chip hybridization procedure. The oligonucleotide array presents several advantages in identifying leukemic gene translocations, such as multiplex screening, relatively low cost, and speed.
BACKGROUND: Identification of specific chromosomal translocations is essential for the diagnosis and prognosis of leukemia. In this study, we employ DNA microarray technology to detect chromosomal aberrations in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML), as well as in leukemic cell lines. METHODS: Reverse transcription using a random 9-mer primer was performed with total RNA from patients and leukemic cells lines. Multiplex PCR reactions using four groups of primer sets were then performed for amplification of cDNA from reverse-transcribed total RNA samples. Normal and fusion sequences were distinguished by hybridization of the amplified cDNA to a selective oligonucleotide array (SOA) containing 20-30mer synthetic probes. A total of 23 sets of oligomers were fabricated on glass slides for the detection of normal and fusion genes, as follows: BCR/ABL, AML/EAP, AML/ETO, AML/MDS, PML/RARA, NUMA1/RARA, PLZF/RARA, and CBFB/MYH. RESULTS: Gene translocation in leukemia was effectively identified with the SOA containing various leukemia-specific fusion and normal control sequences. Leukemic fusion sequences from patients and cell lines hybridized specifically to their complementary probes. The probe sets differing by approximately 50% at their 5' or 3' ends could distinguish between normal and fusion sequences. The entire process of detection was completed within 8 hours using the SOA method. CONCLUSIONS: Probe sets on SOA can effectively discriminate between leukemia-specific fusion and normal sequences with a chip hybridization procedure. The oligonucleotide array presents several advantages in identifying leukemic gene translocations, such as multiplex screening, relatively low cost, and speed.
Authors: V H J van der Velden; A Hochhaus; G Cazzaniga; T Szczepanski; J Gabert; J J M van Dongen Journal: Leukemia Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: N Maroc; A Morel; E Beillard; A L De La Chapelle; X Fund; M-J Mozziconacci; M Dupont; J-M Cayuela; J Gabert; A Koki; V Fert; F Hermitte Journal: Leukemia Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Tong-Tong Zou; Florin M Selaru; Yan Xu; Valentina Shustova; Jing Yin; Yuriko Mori; David Shibata; Fumiaki Sato; Suma Wang; Andreea Olaru; Elena Deacu; Thomas C Liu; John M Abraham; Stephen J Meltzer Journal: Oncogene Date: 2002-07-18 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: E Beillard; N Pallisgaard; V H J van der Velden; W Bi; R Dee; E van der Schoot; E Delabesse; E Macintyre; E Gottardi; G Saglio; F Watzinger; T Lion; J J M van Dongen; P Hokland; J Gabert Journal: Leukemia Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Manuel Salto-Tellez; Suresh G Shelat; Bernice Benoit; Hanna Rennert; Martin Carroll; Debra G B Leonard; Peter Nowell; Adam Bagg Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Tatyana V Nasedkina; Natalia A Guseva; Olga A Gra; Olga N Mityaeva; Alexander V Chudinov; Alexander S Zasedatelev Journal: Mol Diagn Ther Date: 2009 Impact factor: 4.074
Authors: Tao Yan-Fang; Wu Dong; Pang Li; Zhao Wen-Li; Lu Jun; Wang Na; Wang Jian; Feng Xing; Li Yan-Hong; Ni Jian; Pan Jian Journal: Cancer Cell Int Date: 2012-09-08 Impact factor: 5.722