PURPOSE: Evaluation of water sorption and solubility of contemporary resin-based filling materials. METHODS: Specimens of Herculite (HE), Point 4 (P4), TetricCeram (TC), Miris (MI), TetricCeram HB (HB), Solitaire 2 (SO), SureFil (SU), Definite (DE), Admira (AD), Dyract AP (DY), Compoglass F (CO), and TetricFlow (TF) were prepared according to ISO 4049. Water sorption and solubility were measured after water storage at 37 degrees C for 7 days. RESULTS: Water sorption was HE 14 microg mm(-3), P4 17 microg mm(-3), TC 12 microg mm(-3), MI 13 microg mm(-3), HB 9 microg mm(-3), SO 18 microg mm(-3), SU 9 microg mm(-3), DE 14 microg mm(-3), AD 27 microg mm(-3), DY 19 microg mm(-3), CO 23 microg mm(-3), and TF 19 microg mm(-3). Solubility was HE 3 microg mm(-3), P4 3 microg mm(-3), TC 1 microg mm(-3), MI 0 microg mm(-3), HB 0 microg mm(-3), SO 3 microg mm(-3), SU 0 microg mm(-3), DE 1 microg mm(-3), AD 2 microg mm(-3), DY 4 microg mm(-3), CO -2 microg mm(-3), and TF 1 microg mm(-3). CONCLUSION: All materials met the corresponding requirement in ISO 4049. Filler load negatively correlated with water sorption but not with solubility. There was an influence of the resin matrix, too. No significant differences were found between composites, ormocers, and compomers.
PURPOSE: Evaluation of water sorption and solubility of contemporary resin-based filling materials. METHODS: Specimens of Herculite (HE), Point 4 (P4), TetricCeram (TC), Miris (MI), TetricCeram HB (HB), Solitaire 2 (SO), SureFil (SU), Definite (DE), Admira (AD), Dyract AP (DY), Compoglass F (CO), and TetricFlow (TF) were prepared according to ISO 4049. Water sorption and solubility were measured after water storage at 37 degrees C for 7 days. RESULTS:Water sorption was HE 14 microg mm(-3), P4 17 microg mm(-3), TC 12 microg mm(-3), MI 13 microg mm(-3), HB 9 microg mm(-3), SO 18 microg mm(-3), SU 9 microg mm(-3), DE 14 microg mm(-3), AD 27 microg mm(-3), DY 19 microg mm(-3), CO 23 microg mm(-3), and TF 19 microg mm(-3). Solubility was HE 3 microg mm(-3), P4 3 microg mm(-3), TC 1 microg mm(-3), MI 0 microg mm(-3), HB 0 microg mm(-3), SO 3 microg mm(-3), SU 0 microg mm(-3), DE 1 microg mm(-3), AD 2 microg mm(-3), DY 4 microg mm(-3), CO -2 microg mm(-3), and TF 1 microg mm(-3). CONCLUSION: All materials met the corresponding requirement in ISO 4049. Filler load negatively correlated with water sorption but not with solubility. There was an influence of the resin matrix, too. No significant differences were found between composites, ormocers, and compomers.
Authors: Ellen Elisabeth Jansen; Hendrik Meyer-Lueckel; Marcella Esteves-Oliveira; Richard Johannes Wierichs Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2020-12-14 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: José Pereira Leal; Jaqueline Damasceno da Silva; Rafaelle Fernanda Melão Leal; Carlos da Cunha Oliveira-Júnior; Vera Lúcia Gomes Prado; Glauber Campos Vale Journal: Int J Dent Date: 2017-06-08
Authors: Matteo Saccucci; Denise Corridore; Gabriele Di Carlo; Elisa Bonucci; Marco Cicciù; Iole Vozza Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-07 Impact factor: 4.614