R Blackstone1, J Kieran, M Davis, L Rivera. 1. Scottsdale Bariatric Center, 10200 N. 92nd Street, Suite 225, Scottsdale, AZ 85258, USA. blackstonemd@scottsdalebariatric.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Continuous insulin infusion (CII) is proven to decrease morbidity and mortality in surgical critical care patients. This study compared standard insulin therapy with CII in type 2 diabetes patients undergoing elective bariatric surgical procedures in a community hospital. METHODS: A retrospective review investigated 350 bariatric surgical patients with type 2 diabetes who underwent perioperative treatment of hyperglycemia using either standard insulin therapy or CII. The 182 patients in group 1 underwent glucose monitoring and subcutaneous insulin treatment every 6 h, whereas the 168 patients in group 2 had CII treatment beginning in the preoperative holding area and monitored hourly for the next 24 h. The two groups were similar in demographic characteristics. RESULTS: There were no significant hypoglycemic episodes with perioperative CII. The mean perioperative insulin required was 5.8 U/h. The patients receiving CII had fewer postprocedure cholecystectomies, but a higher number of port-site infections. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative CII can be administered safely to diabetic patients undergoing bariatric surgery. The insulin requirements in this population are higher than expected. Our study showed a decrease in the number of postoperative cholecystectomies in the CII group, but no effect on the stricture rate and an increase in the number of patients with postoperative port-site infections.
BACKGROUND:Continuous insulin infusion (CII) is proven to decrease morbidity and mortality in surgical critical care patients. This study compared standard insulin therapy with CII in type 2 diabetespatients undergoing elective bariatric surgical procedures in a community hospital. METHODS: A retrospective review investigated 350 bariatric surgical patients with type 2 diabetes who underwent perioperative treatment of hyperglycemia using either standard insulin therapy or CII. The 182 patients in group 1 underwent glucose monitoring and subcutaneous insulin treatment every 6 h, whereas the 168 patients in group 2 had CII treatment beginning in the preoperative holding area and monitored hourly for the next 24 h. The two groups were similar in demographic characteristics. RESULTS: There were no significant hypoglycemic episodes with perioperative CII. The mean perioperative insulin required was 5.8 U/h. The patients receiving CII had fewer postprocedure cholecystectomies, but a higher number of port-site infections. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative CII can be administered safely to diabeticpatients undergoing bariatric surgery. The insulin requirements in this population are higher than expected. Our study showed a decrease in the number of postoperative cholecystectomies in the CII group, but no effect on the stricture rate and an increase in the number of patients with postoperative port-site infections.
Authors: M L Jacobs; J W Elte; B M van Ouwerkerk; E N Janssens; C Schop; J A Knoop; R P Hoogma; R Groenendijk; R F Weber Journal: Neth J Med Date: 1997-04 Impact factor: 1.422
Authors: Anthony P Furnary; Guangqiang Gao; Gary L Grunkemeier; YingXing Wu; Kathryn J Zerr; Stephen O Bookin; H Storm Floten; Albert Starr Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Dieter Mesotten; Johannes V Swinnen; Frank Vanderhoydonc; Pieter J Wouters; Greet Van den Berghe Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 5.958