Literature DB >> 17285256

Chemical constituents of fugitive dust.

R Scott Van Pelt1, Ted M Zobeck.   

Abstract

Wind erosion selectively winnows the fine, most chemically concentrated portions of surface soils and results in the inter-regional transport of fugitive dust containing plant nutrients, trace elements and other soil-borne contaminants. We sampled and analyzed surface soils, sediments in transport over eroding fields, and attic dust from a small area of the Southern High Plains of Texas to characterize the physical nature and chemical constituents of these materials and to investigate techniques that would allow relatively rapid, low cost techniques for estimating the chemical constituents of fugitive dust from an eroding field. From chemical analyses of actively eroding sediments, it would appear that Ca is the only chemical species that is enriched more than others during the process of fugitive dust production. We found surface soil sieved to produce a sub-sample with particle diameters in the range of 53-74 microm to be a reasonably good surrogate for fugitive dust very near the source field, that sieved sub-samples with particle diameters <10 microm have a crustal enrichment factor of approximately 6, and that this factor, multiplied by the chemical contents of source soils, may be a reasonable estimator of fugitive PM(10) chemistry from the soils of interest. We also found that dust from tractor air cleaners provided a good surrogate for dust entrained by tillage and harvesting operations if the chemical species resulting from engine wear and exhaust were removed from the data set or scaled back to the average of enrichment factors noted for chemical species with no known anthropogenic sources. Chemical analyses of dust samples collected from attics approximately 4 km from the nearest source fields indicated that anthropogenic sources of several environmentally important nutrient and trace element species are much larger contributors, by up to nearly two orders of magnitude, to atmospheric loading and subsequent deposition than fugitive dust from eroding soils.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17285256     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-006-9446-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   3.307


  2 in total

1.  Ceiling (attic) dust: a "museum" of contamination and potential hazard.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Davis; Brian L Gulson
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2005-01-08       Impact factor: 6.498

Review 2.  Dust: a metric for use in residential and building exposure assessment and source characterization.

Authors:  Paul J Lioy; Natalie C G Freeman; James R Millette
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 9.031

  2 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  A review on the importance of metals and metalloids in atmospheric dust and aerosol from mining operations.

Authors:  Janae Csavina; Jason Field; Mark P Taylor; Song Gao; Andrea Landázuri; Eric A Betterton; A Eduardo Sáez
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Surface and Airborne Arsenic Concentrations in a Recreational Site near Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.

Authors:  Dirk Goossens; Brenda J Buck; Yuanxin Teng; Brett T McLaurin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Heavy metal pollution and associated health risk assessment of urban dust in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Abdulaziz G Alghamdi; Mohamed H El-Saeid; Abdulhakim J Alzahrani; Hesham M Ibrahim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  A Comparison of the Health Effects of Ambient Particulate Matter Air Pollution from Five Emission Sources.

Authors:  Neil J Hime; Guy B Marks; Christine T Cowie
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.