Literature DB >> 17284651

Qualification of embryonal carcinoma 2102Ep as a reference for human embryonic stem cell research.

Richard Josephson1, Carol J Ording, Ying Liu, Soojung Shin, Uma Lakshmipathy, Araz Toumadje, Bradley Love, Jonathan D Chesnut, Peter W Andrews, Mahendra S Rao, Jonathan M Auerbach.   

Abstract

As the number of human embryonic stem cell (hESC) lines increases, so does the need for systematic evaluation of each line's characteristics and potential. Comparisons between lines are complicated by variations in culture conditions, feeders, spontaneous differentiation, and the absence of standardized assays. These difficulties, combined with the inability of most labs to maintain more than a few lines simultaneously, compel the development of reference standards to which hESC lines can be compared. The use of a stable cell line as a reference standard offers many advantages. A line with a relatively unchanging hESC-like gene and protein expression pattern could be a positive control for developing assays. It can be used as a reference for genomics or proteomics studies, especially for normalizing results obtained in separate laboratories. Such a cell line should be widely available without intellectual property restraints, easily cultured without feeders, and resistant to spontaneous changes in phenotype. We propose that the embryonal carcinoma (EC) line 2102Ep meets these requirements. We compared the protein, gene, and microRNA expression of this cell line with those of hESC lines and alternative reference lines such as the EC line NTERA-2 and the karyotypically abnormal hESC line BG01V. The overall expression profiles of all these lines were similar, with exceptions reflecting the germ cell origins of EC. On the basis of global gene and microRNA expression, 2102Ep is somewhat less similar to hESC than the alternatives; however, 2102Ep expresses more hESC-associated microRNAs than NTERA-2 does, and fewer markers of differentiated fates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17284651     DOI: 10.1634/stemcells.2006-0236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cells        ISSN: 1066-5099            Impact factor:   6.277


  57 in total

Review 1.  Epigenetic landscape of pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Ji Woong Han; Young-sup Yoon
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 8.401

Review 2.  Concise review: MicroRNA expression in multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells.

Authors:  Uma Lakshmipathy; Ronald P Hart
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 6.277

3.  MicroRNA expression pattern of undifferentiated and differentiated human embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Uma Lakshmipathy; Brad Love; Loyal A Goff; Rebecka Jörnsten; Ralph Graichen; Ronald P Hart; Jonathan D Chesnut
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.272

4.  Embryonic stem cell-specific miR302-367 cluster: human gene structure and functional characterization of its core promoter.

Authors:  Alicia Barroso-delJesus; Cristina Romero-López; Gema Lucena-Aguilar; Gustavo J Melen; Laura Sanchez; Gertrudis Ligero; Alfredo Berzal-Herranz; Pablo Menendez
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2008-08-25       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  MicroRNA discovery and profiling in human embryonic stem cells by deep sequencing of small RNA libraries.

Authors:  Merav Bar; Stacia K Wyman; Brian R Fritz; Junlin Qi; Kavita S Garg; Rachael K Parkin; Evan M Kroh; Ausra Bendoraite; Patrick S Mitchell; Angelique M Nelson; Walter L Ruzzo; Carol Ware; Jerald P Radich; Robert Gentleman; Hannele Ruohola-Baker; Muneesh Tewari
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 6.277

Review 6.  Current methods and challenges in the comprehensive characterization of human pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Joanna S T Asprer; Uma Lakshmipathy
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.739

7.  Pediatric primary central nervous system germ cell tumors of different prognosis groups show characteristic miRNome traits and chromosome copy number variations.

Authors:  Hsei-Wei Wang; Yu-Hsuan Wu; Jui-Yu Hsieh; Muh-Lii Liang; Meng-En Chao; Da-Jung Liu; Ming-Ta Hsu; Tai-Tong Wong
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  A data integration approach to mapping OCT4 gene regulatory networks operative in embryonic stem cells and embryonal carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Marc Jung; Hedi Peterson; Lukas Chavez; Pascal Kahlem; Hans Lehrach; Jaak Vilo; James Adjaye
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Comparison of defined culture systems for feeder cell free propagation of human embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Veronika Akopian; Peter W Andrews; Stephen Beil; Nissim Benvenisty; Jennifer Brehm; Megan Christie; Angela Ford; Victoria Fox; Paul J Gokhale; Lyn Healy; Frida Holm; Outi Hovatta; Barbara B Knowles; Tenneille E Ludwig; Ronald D G McKay; Takamichi Miyazaki; Norio Nakatsuji; Steve K W Oh; Martin F Pera; Janet Rossant; Glyn N Stacey; Hirofumi Suemori
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 2.416

10.  Epigenetic signatures associated with different levels of differentiation potential in human stem cells.

Authors:  Pablo Aranda; Xabier Agirre; Esteban Ballestar; Enrique J Andreu; José Román-Gómez; Inés Prieto; José Ignacio Martín-Subero; Juan Cruz Cigudosa; Reiner Siebert; Manel Esteller; Felipe Prosper
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.