Literature DB >> 17283600

The integration of ecological risk assessment and structured decision making into watershed management.

Dan W Ohlson1, Victor B Serveiss.   

Abstract

Watershed management processes continue to call for more science and improved decision making that take into account the full range of stakeholder perspectives. Increasingly, the core principles of ecological risk assessment (i.e., the development and use of assessment endpoints and conceptual models, conducting exposure and effects analysis) are being incorporated and adapted in innovative ways to meet the call for more science. Similarly, innovative approaches to adapting decision analysis tools and methods for incorporating stakeholder concerns in complex natural resource management decisions are being increasingly applied. Here, we present an example of the integration of ecological risk assessment with decision analysis in the development of a watershed management plan for the Greater Vancouver Water District in British Columbia, Canada. Assessment endpoints were developed, ecological inventory data were collected, and watershed models were developed to characterize the existing and future condition of 3 watersheds in terms of the potential risks to water quality. Stressors to water quality include sedimentation processes (landslides, streambank erosion) and forest disturbance (wildfire, major insect or disease outbreak). Three landscape-level risk management alternatives were developed to reflect different degrees of management intervention. Each alternative was evaluated under different scenarios and analyzed by explicitly examining value-based trade-offs among water quality, environmental, financial, and social endpoints. The objective of this paper is to demonstrate how the integration of ecological risk assessment and decision analysis approaches can support decision makers in watershed management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17283600

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag        ISSN: 1551-3777            Impact factor:   2.992


  3 in total

1.  Spatial distribution and ecological risk assessment of metals in sediments of Baiyangdian wetland ecosystem.

Authors:  Liya Su; Jingling Liu; Per Christensen
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-03-05       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 2.  Natural disturbance impacts on ecosystem services and biodiversity in temperate and boreal forests.

Authors:  Dominik Thom; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2015-05-22

3.  Who Benefits from National Estuaries? Applying the FEGS Classification System to Identify Ecosystem Services and their Beneficiaries.

Authors:  Susan Harrell Yee; Angelica Sullivan; Kathleen C Williams; Kirsten Winters
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.