Literature DB >> 17282971

Porous polyethylene implants in orbital floor reconstruction.

I-Chan Lin1, Shu-Lang Liao, Luke L K Lin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
PURPOSE: Various alloplastic materials are used in orbital wall reconstruction. This study investigated the outcome of patients treated with porous polyethylene sheet implants in the reconstruction of orbital floor fracture.
METHODS: Twenty-one patients who underwent orbital reconstructions using 0.85-mm porous polyethylene sheets for the repair of orbital floor fracture were included. A transconjunctival approach was used in all patients. The mean duration of postoperative follow-up was 29.7 +/- 12.3 months. Postoperatively, results and complications such as infection and implant extrusion were followed-up on the first day, the first week, monthly for the first 3 months and then every 3-6 months thereafter.
RESULTS: All 21 patients had symptomatic diplopia before surgery. The diplopia resolved in 14 patients and improved in seven patients within the first month after surgery. All patients except one were free from diplopia at follow-up periods exceeding 6 months. Preoperative enophthalmos resolved in four of seven patients and improved in three. None of the patients developed orbital infection, implant exposure or migration, worsening diplopia, infraorbital anesthesia or loss of vision during follow-up.
CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated that porous polyethylene implants in the repair of orbital wall fractures had good results with few complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17282971     DOI: 10.1016/S0929-6646(09)60216-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Formos Med Assoc        ISSN: 0929-6646            Impact factor:   3.282


  8 in total

1.  Reconstruction of Orbital Floor Fractures with Porous Polyethylene Implants: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Degala Sai Krishna; Dey Soumadip
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2015-09-21

Review 2.  Retrospective analysis of orbital floor fractures--complications, outcome, and review of literature.

Authors:  Martin Gosau; Moritz Schöneich; Florian G Draenert; Tobias Ettl; Oliver Driemel; Torsten E Reichert
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Biomaterials in skull base surgery.

Authors:  Wolfgang Maier
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-03-10

4.  Biomaterials for orbital fractures repair.

Authors:  M Totir; R Ciuluvica; I Dinu; I Careba; S Gradinaru
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2014

5.  Reconstruction of the orbital floor using supercritical CO2 decellularized porcine bone graft.

Authors:  Chao-Hsin Huang; Dar-Jen Hsieh; Yi-Chia Wu; Ko-Chung Yen; Periasamy Srinivasan; Hsiao-Chen Lee; Ying-Che Chen; Su-Shin Lee
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Biomaterials for orbital fractures repair.

Authors:  M Totir; R Ciuluvica; I Dinu; I Careba; S Gradinaru
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

7.  Maxillofacial reconstruction with Medpor porous polyethylene implant: a case series study.

Authors:  Mansour Khorasani; Pejman Janbaz; Farshid Rayati
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-06-26

Review 8.  Biocompatible Materials for Orbital Wall Reconstruction-An Overview.

Authors:  Victor A Vasile; Sinziana Istrate; Raluca C Iancu; Roxana M Piticescu; Laura M Cursaru; Leopold Schmetterer; Gerhard Garhöfer; Alina Popa Cherecheanu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.623

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.