OBJECTIVE: To determine if adequate syringe coverage --"one shot for one syringe"--among syringe exchange program (SEP) clients is associated with injection-related HIV risk behaviors and syringe disposal. DESIGN: HIV risk assessments with 1577 injection drug users (IDUs) recruited from 24 SEPs in California between 2001 and 2003. Individual syringe coverage was calculated as a proportion of syringes retained from SEP visits to total number of injections in the last 30 days. RESULTS: Participants were divided into four groups based on syringe coverage: <50%, 50-99%, 100-149%, and 150% or more. In multivariate logistic regression, SEP clients with less than 50% syringe coverage had significantly higher odds of reporting receptive syringe sharing in the last 30 days (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.4, 3.6) and those with 150% or more coverage had lower odds of reporting receptive syringe sharing (AOR=0.5; 95%CI=0.3, 0.8) as compared to SEP clients with adequate syringe coverage of 100-149%. Similar associations were observed for other main outcomes of distributive syringe sharing and syringe re-use. No differences in safe syringe disposal were observed by syringe coverage. CONCLUSIONS: Individual syringe coverage is strongly associated with safer injection behaviors without impacting syringe disposal among SEP clients. Syringe coverage is a useful measure for determining if IDUs are obtaining sufficient syringes to lower HIV risk.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if adequate syringe coverage --"one shot for one syringe"--among syringe exchange program (SEP) clients is associated with injection-related HIV risk behaviors and syringe disposal. DESIGN: HIV risk assessments with 1577 injection drug users (IDUs) recruited from 24 SEPs in California between 2001 and 2003. Individual syringe coverage was calculated as a proportion of syringes retained from SEP visits to total number of injections in the last 30 days. RESULTS:Participants were divided into four groups based on syringe coverage: <50%, 50-99%, 100-149%, and 150% or more. In multivariate logistic regression, SEP clients with less than 50% syringe coverage had significantly higher odds of reporting receptive syringe sharing in the last 30 days (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.4, 3.6) and those with 150% or more coverage had lower odds of reporting receptive syringe sharing (AOR=0.5; 95%CI=0.3, 0.8) as compared to SEP clients with adequate syringe coverage of 100-149%. Similar associations were observed for other main outcomes of distributive syringe sharing and syringe re-use. No differences in safe syringe disposal were observed by syringe coverage. CONCLUSIONS: Individual syringe coverage is strongly associated with safer injection behaviors without impacting syringe disposal among SEP clients. Syringe coverage is a useful measure for determining if IDUs are obtaining sufficient syringes to lower HIV risk.
Authors: Juan C Reyes; Rafaela R Robles; Héctor M Colón; Tomás D Matos; H Ann Finlinson; C Amalia Marrero; Elizabeth W Shepard Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2005-05-25 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Ricky N Bluthenthal; Greg Ridgeway; Terry Schell; Rachel Anderson; Neil M Flynn; Alex H Kral Journal: Addiction Date: 2007-02-06 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Jennifer Lorvick; Ricky N Bluthenthal; Andrea Scott; Mary Lou Gilbert; Kara S Riehman; Rachel L Anderson; Neil M Flynn; Alex H Kral Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2006 Impact factor: 2.164
Authors: Judith Snead; Moher Downing; Jennifer Lorvick; Barbara Garcia; Robert Thawley; Susan Kegeles; Brian R Edlin Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Traci C Green; Ricky N Bluthenthal; Merrill Singer; Leo Beletsky; Lauretta E Grau; Patricia Marshall; Robert Heimer Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2010-05-26 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Lynn D Wenger; Alexis N Martinez; Lisa Carpenter; Dara Geckeler; Grant Colfax; Alex H Kral Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2010-05-13 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Barbara Tempalski; Hannah L Cooper; Samuel R Friedman; Don C Des Jarlais; Joanne Brady; Karla Gostnell Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2008-03-04
Authors: Hannah Cooper; Don Des Jarlais; Zev Ross; Barbara Tempalski; Brian H Bossak; Samuel R Friedman Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Linda Drach; Jessica Guernsey; Julie E Maher; Maureen Rumptz; Mike Stark; Kathryn Pranian; Carol Casciato Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Susan G Sherman; Shivani A Patel; Daesha V Ramachandran; Noya Galai; Patrick Chaulk; Chris Serio-Chapman; Renee M Gindi Journal: Drug Alcohol Rev Date: 2015-04-28
Authors: Alan Neaigus; Mingfang Zhao; V Anna Gyarmathy; Linda Cisek; Samuel R Friedman; Robert C Baxter Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2008-03-14 Impact factor: 3.671