Literature DB >> 17279848

Why some groups just feel better: the regulatory fit of group power.

Kai Sassenberg1, Kai J Jonas, James Y Shah, Paige C Brazy.   

Abstract

The current research applied the regulatory fit hypothesis (E. T. Higgins, 2000) to the evaluation of groups, suggesting that individuals' group appraisal depends on how well the groups fit their regulatory needs. Specifically, it was predicted that higher power groups would fit and be more valued by those individuals with a promotion focus because these groups provide a better opportunity to sustain nurturance and achievement needs. Alternatively, lower power groups were predicted to fit and be more valued by those individuals with a prevention focus because these groups necessitate (and thus sustain) a focus on safety and security. Five studies found support for these predictions by both assessing and manipulating regulatory focus and group power and by using explicit and implicit measures of group attraction. Moreover, these regulatory fit effects occurred specifically for group power and not for general differences in group status. ((c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17279848     DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.2.249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  7 in total

1.  NONCONSCIOUS EFFECTS OF POWER ON BASIC APPROACH AND AVOIDANCE TENDENCIES.

Authors:  Pamela K Smith; John A Bargh
Journal:  Soc Cogn       Date:  2008-02

2.  Motivational consequences of counterfactual mindsets: Does counterfactual structure influence the use of conservative or risky tactics?

Authors:  Kevin Winter; Kai Epstude
Journal:  Motiv Emot       Date:  2022-09-10

3.  Stereotype threat reinterpreted as a regulatory mismatch.

Authors:  Lisa R Grimm; Arthur B Markman; W Todd Maddox; Grant C Baldwin
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2009-02

4.  A motivational determinant of facial emotion recognition: regulatory focus affects recognition of emotions in faces.

Authors:  Claudia Sassenrath; Kai Sassenberg; Devin G Ray; Katharina Scheiter; Halszka Jarodzka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Attracted to power: challenge/threat and promotion/prevention focus differentially predict the attractiveness of group power.

Authors:  Annika Scholl; Claudia Sassenrath; Kai Sassenberg
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-07

6.  Gain +1 or Avoid -1: Validation of the German Regulatory Focus Questionnaire (RFQ).

Authors:  Bjarne Schmalbach; Markus Zenger; Roy Spina; Ileana Steffens-Guerra; Sören Kliem; Michalis Michaelides; Andreas Hinz
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2017-12-19

7.  Room for advancement: The regulatory fit of bottom-rank intermediate feedback.

Authors:  Melvyn R W Hamstra; Bert Schreurs
Journal:  Eur J Soc Psychol       Date:  2018-05-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.