Literature DB >> 17279778

Effects of heme pocket structure and mobility on cytochrome c stability.

Xin Wen1, Kirti M Patel, Brandy S Russell, Kara L Bren.   

Abstract

Unfolding thermodynamics of a thermophilic cytochrome c552 from Hydrogenobacter thermophilus (Ht cyt c552) and its mesophilic homologue from Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pa cyt c551) as well as two heme pocket point mutants (Ht-Q64N and Pa-N64Q) are characterized by determination of protein stability curves (plots of unfolding free energy, DeltaG, vs T). These proteins show revealing differences in heme pocket hydrogen bonding and mobility. It previously has been shown that Asn64 in Pa cyt c551 and in Ht-Q64N interacts with the heme axial Met to fix it in a single conformation [Wen, X., and Bren, K. L. (2005) Biochemistry 44, 5225-5233]. In Ht cyt c552 and Pa-N64Q, Gln64 does not interact with the axial Met; in these variants the axial Met samples more than one conformation [Wen, X., and Bren, K. L. (2005) Inorg. Chem. 44, 8587-8593]. Here it is demonstrated that, relative to wild type, Pa-N64Q displays enhanced stability with an increase in unfolding free energy (DeltaDeltaG) of 7.1 kJ/mol and an increase in denaturation temperature (DeltaTm) of 8 degrees C. Correspondingly, Ht-Q64N is less stable than Ht cyt c552, with a DeltaDeltaG of -10 kJ/mol and a DeltaTm of -10 degrees C. Analysis of unfolding thermodynamics indicates that the net changes in stability resulting from the position 64 mutations are primarily attributable to entropic factors. For Pa-N64Q (Ht-Q64N) it is proposed that the favorable release (unfavorable burial) of residue 64 is the dominant factor impacting stability. The mobility of the axial Met also is proposed to contribute. These results provide a specific illustration of how amino acid side chain mobility and burial or release contribute to protein stability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17279778     DOI: 10.1021/bi602380v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  6 in total

1.  Methionine ligand lability in bacterial monoheme cytochromes c: an electrochemical study.

Authors:  Benjamin D Levin; Mehmet Can; Sarah E J Bowman; Kara L Bren; Sean J Elliott
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 2.  Cytochrome c/cardiolipin relations in mitochondria: a kiss of death.

Authors:  Valerian E Kagan; Hülya A Bayir; Natalia A Belikova; Olexandr Kapralov; Yulia Y Tyurina; Vladimir A Tyurin; Jianfei Jiang; Detcho A Stoyanovsky; Peter Wipf; Patrick M Kochanek; Joel S Greenberger; Bruce Pitt; Anna A Shvedova; Grigory Borisenko
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 7.376

3.  Heme attachment motif mobility tunes cytochrome c redox potential.

Authors:  Lea V Michel; Tao Ye; Sarah E J Bowman; Benjamin D Levin; Megan A Hahn; Brandy S Russell; Sean J Elliott; Kara L Bren
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2007-09-28       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Submolecular unfolding units of Pseudomonas aeruginosa cytochrome c-551.

Authors:  Lea V Michel; Kara L Bren
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 3.358

5.  Alanine to serine substitutions drive thermal adaptation in a psychrophilic diatom cytochrome c6.

Authors:  Miranda Wilson; Logan Tillery; Emily Tabaie; Galen Beery; Jordyn Preusker; Inaara Bhola; Katherine Frato
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 3.358

6.  1H and 13C NMR spectroscopic studies of the ferriheme resonances of three low-spin complexes of wild-type nitrophorin 2 and nitrophorin 2(V24E) as a function of pH.

Authors:  Fei Yang; Markus Knipp; Tatiana K Shokhireva; Robert E Berry; Hongjun Zhang; F Ann Walker
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 3.358

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.