OBJECTIVE: To describe Ottawa family physicians' perceptions of their preparedness to respond to outbreaks of infectious diseases or other public health emergencies and to assess their capacity and willingness to assist in the event of such emergencies. DESIGN: Cross-sectional self-administered survey conducted between February 11 and March 10, 2004. SETTING: The City of Ottawa, Ont, and the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Ottawa. PARTICIPANTS: Ottawa family physicians; respondents can be considered a self-selected sample. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported office preparedness and physicians' capacity and willingness to respond to public health emergencies. RESULTS: Response rate was 41%. Of 676 physicians contacted, 274 responded, and of those, 246 completed surveys. About 26% of respondents felt prepared for an outbreak of influenza not well covered by vaccine. About 18% felt prepared for serious respiratory epidemics, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome; about 50% felt unprepared. Most respondents (80%) thought they were not ready to respond to an earthquake. About 77% of physicians were willing to be contacted on an urgent basis in case of a public health emergency. Of these, 94% would assist in immunization clinics, 84% in antibiotic clinics, 58% in assessment centres, 52% in treatment centres, 41% with declaration of death, 26% with home care, and 23% with telephone counseling. CONCLUSION: Family physicians appear to be unprepared for, but willing to address, serious public health emergencies. It is essential to set up effective partnerships between primary care and public health services to support family physicians' capacity to respond to emergencies. This type of study, along with the creation of a register of available services and of a virtual network for sharing information, is an initial step in assessing primary care response.
OBJECTIVE: To describe Ottawa family physicians' perceptions of their preparedness to respond to outbreaks of infectious diseases or other public health emergencies and to assess their capacity and willingness to assist in the event of such emergencies. DESIGN: Cross-sectional self-administered survey conducted between February 11 and March 10, 2004. SETTING: The City of Ottawa, Ont, and the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Ottawa. PARTICIPANTS: Ottawa family physicians; respondents can be considered a self-selected sample. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported office preparedness and physicians' capacity and willingness to respond to public health emergencies. RESULTS: Response rate was 41%. Of 676 physicians contacted, 274 responded, and of those, 246 completed surveys. About 26% of respondents felt prepared for an outbreak of influenza not well covered by vaccine. About 18% felt prepared for serious respiratory epidemics, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome; about 50% felt unprepared. Most respondents (80%) thought they were not ready to respond to an earthquake. About 77% of physicians were willing to be contacted on an urgent basis in case of a public health emergency. Of these, 94% would assist in immunization clinics, 84% in antibiotic clinics, 58% in assessment centres, 52% in treatment centres, 41% with declaration of death, 26% with home care, and 23% with telephone counseling. CONCLUSION: Family physicians appear to be unprepared for, but willing to address, serious public health emergencies. It is essential to set up effective partnerships between primary care and public health services to support family physicians' capacity to respond to emergencies. This type of study, along with the creation of a register of available services and of a virtual network for sharing information, is an initial step in assessing primary care response.
Authors: Arjun Srinivasan; Lawrence C McDonald; Daniel Jernigan; Rita Helfand; Kathleen Ginsheimer; John Jernigan; Linda Chiarello; Raymond Chinn; Umesh Parashar; Larry Anderson; Denise Cardo Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: John L Hick; Dan Hanfling; Jonathan L Burstein; Craig DeAtley; Donna Barbisch; Gregory M Bogdan; Stephen Cantrill Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: George Rust; Mollie Melbourne; Benedict I Truman; Elvan Daniels; Yvonne Fry-Johnson; Thomas Curtin Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Ran D Balicer; Daniel J Barnett; Carol B Thompson; Edbert B Hsu; Christina L Catlett; Christopher M Watson; Natalie L Semon; Howard S Gwon; Jonathan M Links Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-07-26 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Charlotte Scheerens; Els Bekaert; Sunanda Ray; Akye Essuman; Bob Mash; Peter Decat; An De Sutter; Patrick Van Damme; Wouter Vanhove; Samuel Lietaer; Jan De Maeseneer; Farai Madzimbamuto; Ilse Ruyssen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-11 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Mahomed S Patel; Christine B Phillips; Christopher Pearce; Marjan Kljakovic; Paul Dugdale; Nicholas Glasgow Journal: PLoS One Date: 2008-05-28 Impact factor: 3.240