Literature DB >> 17278986

Rates and determinants of reinitiating antihypertensive therapy after prolonged stoppage: a population-based study.

Boris L G van Wijk1, Jerry Avorn, Daniel H Solomon, Olaf H Klungel, Eibert R Heerdink, Anthonius de Boer, Alan M Brookhart.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess patterns of restarting antihypertensive drugs after a prolonged period of discontinuation.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study among new users of blood pressure-lowering medication in the PHARMO database in The Netherlands, who had a period of at least 180 days without such medication. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to explore the baseline variables associated with reinitiating treatment. Case-crossover analysis was used to evaluate determinants of reinitiating treatment.
RESULTS: We identified 35,714 patients as initiating blood pressure-lowering treatment during the period 1 January 1999 to 30 June 2004. Of the 18,357 (51.4%) patients who discontinued blood pressure-lowering treatment, 19.3% restarted treatment within 1 year and 60.7% restarted within 6 years. With every additional year they had been on therapy, patients were more likely to restart [odds ratio (OR) = 1.38; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.34-1.42]. The case-crossover analysis revealed that hospitalization for cardiovascular disease (OR = 2.20; 95% CI = 1.84-2.63), as well as refilling of another cardiovascular medication (OR = 1.25; 95% CI = 1.11-1.40), were each independently associated with reinitiating treatment. Refilling non-cardiovascular medications was not associated with reinitiating treatment (OR = 1.03; 95% CI = 0.97-1.10).
CONCLUSION: Physicians should be aware that many patients have prolonged periods of discontinuation during the use of blood pressure-lowering medication, and that most of these patients will eventually resume therapy. Ongoing refilling other medications is not associated with reinitiating treatment. This suggests that, for some patients, the decision to discontinue may be drug specific rather than a behavioural characteristic applicable to all chronic treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17278986     DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3280148a58

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  4 in total

1.  How does prescribing for antihypertensive products stack up against guideline recommendations? An Australian population-based study (2006-2014).

Authors:  Andrea L Schaffer; Sallie-Anne Pearson; Nicholas A Buckley
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Rationale and design of the regimen education and messaging in diabetes (REMinD) trial.

Authors:  Rachel O'Conor; Marina Arvanitis; Guisselle Wismer; Lauren Opsasnick; Angela Sanchez Muñoz; Joseph Kannry; Jenny J Lin; Darren Kaiser; Mary J Kwasny; Stephen D Persell; Ruth Parker; Alastair J J Wood; Alex D Federman; Michael S Wolf
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  The dynamics of chronic gout treatment: medication gaps and return to therapy.

Authors:  Leslie R Harrold; Susan E Andrade; Becky Briesacher; Marsha A Raebel; Hassan Fouayzi; Robert A Yood; Ira S Ockene
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Pharmacy-based predictors of non-adherence, non-persistence and reinitiation of antihypertensive drugs among patients on oral diabetes drugs in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Sofa D Alfian; Petra Denig; André Coelho; Eelko Hak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.