PURPOSES: The purposes of this study were to examine dose alterations to gross tumor volume (GTV) and lung using heterogeneity corrections and to predict the magnitude of these changes. METHODS: Three separate conformal plans were generated for 37 patients with lung cancer: plan 1 corrected for heterogeneity, plan 2 did not correct for heterogeneity, and plan 3 used identical beams and monitor units from plan 2 but with heterogeneous calculations. Plans 1 and 2 were normalized to the 95% isodose line. Mean dose (MeanDGTV), maximum dose (MaxDGTV), and minimum dose (MinDGTV) to GTV and V20 were compared between plans 1 and 3. For each patient, the amount of lung in all beam paths of plan 3 was quantified by a density correction factor and correlated with the percent change. RESULTS: The median percent change in MeanDGTV, MaxDGTV, and MinDGTV between plan 3 and plan 1 was -4.7% (-0.1% to -19.1%, P < 0.0001), -5.59% (0.16% to -31.86%, P < 0.0001), and -4.88% (2.90% to -24.88%, P < 0.0001), respectively. The median V20 difference was -1% (1% to -8%). The density correction factor correlated with larger differences in MeanDGTV on univariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Heterogeneity correction lowers the dose to GTV by 5%. This difference can be correlated with the density correction factor.
PURPOSES: The purposes of this study were to examine dose alterations to gross tumor volume (GTV) and lung using heterogeneity corrections and to predict the magnitude of these changes. METHODS: Three separate conformal plans were generated for 37 patients with lung cancer: plan 1 corrected for heterogeneity, plan 2 did not correct for heterogeneity, and plan 3 used identical beams and monitor units from plan 2 but with heterogeneous calculations. Plans 1 and 2 were normalized to the 95% isodose line. Mean dose (MeanDGTV), maximum dose (MaxDGTV), and minimum dose (MinDGTV) to GTV and V20 were compared between plans 1 and 3. For each patient, the amount of lung in all beam paths of plan 3 was quantified by a density correction factor and correlated with the percent change. RESULTS: The median percent change in MeanDGTV, MaxDGTV, and MinDGTV between plan 3 and plan 1 was -4.7% (-0.1% to -19.1%, P < 0.0001), -5.59% (0.16% to -31.86%, P < 0.0001), and -4.88% (2.90% to -24.88%, P < 0.0001), respectively. The median V20 difference was -1% (1% to -8%). The density correction factor correlated with larger differences in MeanDGTV on univariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Heterogeneity correction lowers the dose to GTV by 5%. This difference can be correlated with the density correction factor.
Authors: Ying Xiao; Lech Papiez; Rebecca Paulus; Robert Timmerman; William L Straube; Walter R Bosch; Jeff Michalski; James M Galvin Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2009-03-15 Impact factor: 7.038