Literature DB >> 17278814

Monte Carlo simulations of dose near a nonradioactive gold seed.

James C L Chow1, Grigor N Grigorov.   

Abstract

The relative doses and hot/cold spot positions around a non-radioactive gold seed, irradiated by a 6 or 18 MV photon beam in water, were calculated using Monte Carlo simulation. Phase space files of 6 and 18 MV photon beams with a field size of 1 x 1 cm2 were generated by a Varian 21 EX linear accelerator using the EGSnrc and BEAMnrc code. The seed (1.2 x 1.2 x 3.2 mm3) was positioned at the isocenter in a water phantom (20 x 20 x 20 cm2) with source-to-axis distance = 100 cm. For the single beam geometry, the relative doses (normalized to the dose at 5 mm distance above the isocenter) at the upstream seed surface were calculated to be 1.64 and 1.56 for the 6 and 18 MV beams respectively when the central beam axis (CAX) is parallel to the width of the seed. These doses were slightly higher than those (1.58 and 1.52 for 6 and 18 MV beams respectively) calculated when the CAX is perpendicular to the width of the seed. Compared to the relative dose profiles with the same beam geometry without the seed in the water phantom, the presence of the seed affects the dose distribution at about 3 mm distance beyond both the upstream and downstream seed surface. For a pair of opposing beams with equal and unequal beam weight, the hot and cold spots of both opposing beams were mixed. For a 360 degree photon arc around the longitudinal axis of the seed, the relative dose profile along the width of the seed was similar to that of the opposing beam pair, except the former geometry has a larger dose gradient near the seed surface. In this study, selected results from our simulation were compared to previous measurements using film dosimetry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17278814     DOI: 10.1118/1.2388573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  6 in total

Review 1.  Technological advances in radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mehee Choi; Arthur Y Hung
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Assessment of dose perturbations for metal stent in photon and proton radiotherapy plans for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Boram Lee; Sungkoo Cho; Hee Chul Park; Sang-Won Kang; Jae-Sung Kim; Jin-Beom Chung
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 4.309

3.  Calcium Phosphate Cement Paste Injection as a Fiducial Marker of Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Ichiro Ogino; Masakazu Kitagawa; Shigenobu Watanabe; Hiroshi Yoshida; Masaharu Hata
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  Increased dose near the skin due to electromagnetic surface beacon transponder.

Authors:  Kang-Hyun Ahn; Ryan Manger; Howard J Halpern; Bulent Aydogan
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Dosimetric impact of gold markers implanted closely to lung tumors: a Monte Carlo simulation.

Authors:  Takehiro Shiinoki; Akira Sawada; Yoshitomo Ishihara; Yuki Miyabe; Yukinori Matsuo; Takashi Mizowaki; Masaki Kokubo; Masahiro Hiraoka
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Determination of optimal fiducial marker across image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) modalities: visibility and artifact analysis of gold, carbon, and polymer fiducial markers.

Authors:  Lydia L Handsfield; Ning J Yue; Jinghao Zhou; Ting Chen; Sharad Goyal
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 2.102

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.