OBJECTIVES: To evaluate client treatment retention and evolution in terms of living conditions, at-risk behaviours, and the use of psychoactive substances (PAS) over a one-year period, following admission into a low-threshold methadone program in Montreal. METHOD: Individual interviews were administered to 114 clients from Relais-Méthadone (RM) at admission and one year after treatment initiation. Participants reported on PAS consumption and unsafe practices of drug use and sexual behaviours at high risk for transmission of HIV, sexually transmitted infections (STI) and other blood-borne viruses (BBV). Services utilized by clients were documented from Relais-Méthadone files. Bivariate analyses were used to compare data recorded at admission and one-year follow-up. RESULTS: The treatment retention rate after one year at RM was 64%. However, by taking into account those clients who were transferred to a regular program during the study period, as well as those who voluntarily tapered their methadone treatment (16.7%), the status of 80.7% of clients demonstrated improvement one year after admission into treatment. Furthermore, the clients who remained in treatment for a year for whom information was available (n = 60) showed a tendency towards more stable living conditions. They also demonstrated a significant decrease in both the number of PAS injections and in risky behaviours related to drug consumption. A statistically significant decrease in the frequency of heroine and cocaine use was also observed. By contrast, however, two thirds of the individuals in treatment after a year (n = 42) maintained or increased their daily consumption of other PAS. DISCUSSION: The treatment retention rate is comparable to other low or regular threshold substitution programs. The results support previous studies showing that the methadone substitution treatment reduces heroine and cocaine consumption, and decreases the number of unsafe behaviours that could potentially transmit HIV, STI and BBV for the majority of clients who remained in treatment. Future research could focus attention on people who abandon treatment and those who present at-risk behaviours during treatment.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate client treatment retention and evolution in terms of living conditions, at-risk behaviours, and the use of psychoactive substances (PAS) over a one-year period, following admission into a low-threshold methadone program in Montreal. METHOD: Individual interviews were administered to 114 clients from Relais-Méthadone (RM) at admission and one year after treatment initiation. Participants reported on PAS consumption and unsafe practices of drug use and sexual behaviours at high risk for transmission of HIV, sexually transmitted infections (STI) and other blood-borne viruses (BBV). Services utilized by clients were documented from Relais-Méthadone files. Bivariate analyses were used to compare data recorded at admission and one-year follow-up. RESULTS: The treatment retention rate after one year at RM was 64%. However, by taking into account those clients who were transferred to a regular program during the study period, as well as those who voluntarily tapered their methadone treatment (16.7%), the status of 80.7% of clients demonstrated improvement one year after admission into treatment. Furthermore, the clients who remained in treatment for a year for whom information was available (n = 60) showed a tendency towards more stable living conditions. They also demonstrated a significant decrease in both the number of PAS injections and in risky behaviours related to drug consumption. A statistically significant decrease in the frequency of heroine and cocaine use was also observed. By contrast, however, two thirds of the individuals in treatment after a year (n = 42) maintained or increased their daily consumption of other PAS. DISCUSSION: The treatment retention rate is comparable to other low or regular threshold substitution programs. The results support previous studies showing that the methadone substitution treatment reduces heroine and cocaine consumption, and decreases the number of unsafe behaviours that could potentially transmit HIV, STI and BBV for the majority of clients who remained in treatment. Future research could focus attention on people who abandon treatment and those who present at-risk behaviours during treatment.
Authors: Carol J Strike; William Gnam; Karen Urbanoski; Benedikt Fischer; David C Marsh; Margaret Millson Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: M W Langendam; H J van Haastrecht; G H van Brussel; H Reurs; A A van den Hoek; R A Coutinho; E J van Ameijden Journal: Addiction Date: 1998-01 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Cari L Miller; Sarah J Fielden; Mark W Tyndall; Ruth Zhang; Kate Gibson; Kate Shannon Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2011-05-26 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Eugenia Oviedo-Joekes; Bohdan Nosyk; Suzanne Brissette; Jill Chettiar; Pascal Schneeberger; David C Marsh; Michael Krausz; Aslam Anis; Martin T Schechter Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2008-08-29 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Kristi Hill; Laura Nussdorf; Julia D Mount; Rachel Silk; Chloe Gross; David Sternberg; Phyllis Bijole; Miriam Jones; Randy Kier; Dana Mccullough; Poonam Mathur; Shyam Kottilil; Henry Masur; Sarah Kattakuzhy; Elana S Rosenthal Journal: J Addict Med Date: 2022 Jan-Feb 01 Impact factor: 3.702