Literature DB >> 17278032

Subcutaneous venous port implantation in patients with bilateral breast surgery.

Bora Peynircioglu1, E Bengi Arslan, Barbaros E Cil, Serdar Geyik, Tuncay Hazirolan, Ali Konan, Ferhun Balkanci.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term follow-up results of subcutaneous venous ports implanted in patients with bilateral mastectomies. We retrospectively reviewed the hospital charts and the electronic database of 17 patients with bilateral mastectomies whom had venous port implantation in our interventional radiology suit. A total of 17 ports were implanted to the paramedian (n = 3) and anterolateral (standard; n = 12) chest wall, on the trapezius muscle (n = 1), and to the antecubital fossa (n = 1). The mean age was 48.29 years (range: 35-60 years). The mean time interval from time of surgery to port implantation was 34 months (range: 1-84 months). The mean follow-up time was 15 months (range: 7-39 months). Follow-up parameters and classification of the complications was defined according to the SIR guidelines. No procedure-related complication occurred. A single case of mild late infection was noted and the infection rate was 0.19/1000 catheter days. Infusion chemotherapy administration was still going on in eight patients. Two patients died during the follow-up and four patients were lost after 6 months. Port removal was performed in three patients at follow-up because of the end of treatment. One trapezius port and one paramedian port weres among the removed ports without any problem. Although we have a limited number of patients, port placement to the anterior chest wall, either paramedian or anterolateral, on the trapezius muscle or to the antecubital fossa depending on the extent of the bilateral breast surgeries that can be performed with low complication rates by a careful patient and anatomical location selection by involving the patients in the decision-making process. We believe that patient education and knowledge of possible complications have high importance in follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17278032     DOI: 10.1007/s00270-006-0301-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol        ISSN: 0174-1551            Impact factor:   2.740


  5 in total

1.  Femoral port placement - report of two cases.

Authors:  K Harish; Y C Madhu
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-05-24

2.  Choosing the appropriate side for subcutaneous port catheter placement in patients with mastectomy: ipsilateral or contralateral?

Authors:  Omer Fatih Nas; Kadir Hacikurt; Ahmet Kaya; Nurullah Dogan; Bekir Sanal; Guven Ozkaya; Halit Ziya Dundar; Cuneyt Erdogan
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Dislocation of Intravenous Port Systems - Three Case Reports.

Authors:  Katharina Seck; Steffen Saupe; Marion Kiechle; Nadia Harbeck
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Comparison between Arm Port and Chest Port for Optimal Vascular Access Port in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ye Liu; Li-Li Li; Lei Xu; Dong-Dong Feng; Yu Cao; Xiao-Yun Mao; Jin Zheng; Feng Jin; Bo Chen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Tailored approach to the choice of long-term vascular access in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Hyangkyoung Kim; Sukyung Kwon; Soo Mi Son; Eunseon Jeong; Jang-Yong Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.