Literature DB >> 17277969

Osteoprogenitor response to low-adhesion nanotopographies originally fabricated by electron beam lithography.

Andrew Hart1, Nikolaj Gadegaard, Chris D W Wilkinson, Richard O C Oreffo, Matthew J Dalby.   

Abstract

It is considered that cells can use filopodia, or microspikes, to locate sites suitable for adhesion. This has been investigated using a number of mature cell types, but, to our knowledge, not progenitor cells. Chemical and topographical cues on the underlying substrate are a useful tool for producing defined features for cells to respond to. In this study, arrays of nanopits with different symmetries (square or hexagonal arrays with 120 nm diameters, 300 nm center-centre spacings) and osteoprogenitor cells were considered. The pits were fabricated by ultra-high precision electron-beam lithography and then reproduced in polycarbonate by injection moulding with a nickel stamp. Using scanning electron and fluorescence microscopies, the initial interactions of the cells via filopodia have been observed, as have subsequent adhesion and cytoskeletal formation. The results showed increased filopodia interaction with the surrounding nanoarchitecture leading to a decrease in cell spreading, focal adhesion formation and cytoskeletal organisation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17277969     DOI: 10.1007/s10856-007-0157-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   4.727


  33 in total

1.  Contact guidance of chick embryo neurons on single scratches in glass and on underlying aligned human skin fibroblasts.

Authors:  E Sţepień; J Stanisz; W Korohoda
Journal:  Cell Biol Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 2.  Structures in focus--filopodia.

Authors:  William Wood; Paul Martin
Journal:  Int J Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.085

Review 3.  Do filopodia enable the growth cone to find its way?

Authors:  Anthony J Koleske
Journal:  Sci STKE       Date:  2003-05-20

Review 4.  Focal adhesions, contractility, and signaling.

Authors:  K Burridge; M Chrzanowska-Wodnicka
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 13.827

5.  Single-molecule analysis of chemotactic signaling in Dictyostelium cells.

Authors:  M Ueda; Y Sako; T Tanaka; P Devreotes; T Yanagida
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-10-26       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Skeletal progenitor cells and ageing human populations.

Authors:  R O Oreffo; S Bord; J T Triffitt
Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 6.124

7.  In vitro mechanical and biological assessment of hydroxyapatite-reinforced polyethylene composite.

Authors:  J Huang; L Di Silvio; M Wang; K E Tanner; W Bonfield
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Investigating filopodia sensing using arrays of defined nano-pits down to 35 nm diameter in size.

Authors:  Matthew J Dalby; Nikolaj Gadegaard; Mathis O Riehle; Chris D W Wilkinson; Adam S G Curtis
Journal:  Int J Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.085

Review 9.  Material-tissue interfaces: the role of surface properties and processes.

Authors:  B Kasemo; J Lausmaa
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Guidance of CNS growth cones by substratum grooves and ridges: effects of inhibitors of the cytoskeleton, calcium channels and signal transduction pathways.

Authors:  A Rajnicek; C McCaig
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.285

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Determinants of cell-material crosstalk at the interface: towards engineering of cell instructive materials.

Authors:  Maurizio Ventre; Filippo Causa; Paolo A Netti
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 2.  Biomaterials and interface with bone.

Authors:  K Anselme
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Mesenchymal stem cell mechanobiology and emerging experimental platforms.

Authors:  Luke MacQueen; Yu Sun; Craig A Simmons
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 4.  Topography design concept of a tissue engineering scaffold for controlling cell function and fate through actin cytoskeletal modulation.

Authors:  Hiromi Miyoshi; Taiji Adachi
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 6.389

5.  NANOPATTERNED INTERFACES FOR CONTROLLING CELL BEHAVIOR.

Authors:  Kevin Chung; Jessica A DeQUACH; Karen L Christman
Journal:  Nano Life       Date:  2010-03

Review 6.  Engineering substrate topography at the micro- and nanoscale to control cell function.

Authors:  Christopher J Bettinger; Robert Langer; Jeffrey T Borenstein
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 15.336

7.  Adhesion, spreading and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells cultured on micropatterned amorphous diamond, titanium, tantalum and chromium coatings on silicon.

Authors:  Sami Myllymaa; Emilia Kaivosoja; Katja Myllymaa; Tarvo Sillat; Hannu Korhonen; Reijo Lappalainen; Yrjö T Konttinen
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 8.  Nanotopographical modification: a regulator of cellular function through focal adhesions.

Authors:  Manus Jonathan Paul Biggs; R Geoff Richards; Matthew J Dalby
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 5.307

9.  Genomic expression of mesenchymal stem cells to altered nanoscale topographies.

Authors:  Matthew J Dalby; Abhay Andar; Abhijit Nag; Stanley Affrossman; Rahul Tare; Sara McFarlane; Richard O C Oreffo
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-09-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 10.  Cellular response to low adhesion nanotopographies.

Authors:  Matthew J Dalby
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2007
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.