PURPOSE: Protocadherin-15 (PCDH15) is one of the five genes currently identified as being mutated in Usher 1 syndrome and defines Usher syndrome type 1F (USH1F). When PCDH15 was systematically analyzed for mutations in a cohort of USH1 patients, a number of deletions were found. Here we characterize these deletions as to extent, position, and breakpoints. METHODS: Microsatellite and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analyses, used in a preliminary survey of an Usher cohort of 31 patients, revealed large deletions in three patients. These deletions were further characterized by semiquantitative PCR assays to narrow down the breakpoints. RESULTS: The analysis of the three large deletions revealed that all six breakpoints are different. The breakpoint junction was identified in one patient and the four other breakpoints were mapped to 4 kb. There were no specific distinguishing features of the isolated breakpoints. CONCLUSIONS: A complete screen of PCDH15 should include a search for large deletions. Failure to screen for gross genomic rearrangements is likely to significantly lower the mutation detection rate. A likely explanation for the high rate of such deletions is the unusual gene structure. PCDH15 gene spans nearly 1 Mb for a corresponding open reading frame (ORF) of 7,021 bp. The intron sizes of PCDH15 are up to 150 kb, and the first three exons of the gene cover 0.42 Mb. The genomic structure of any gene should be taken into consideration when designing a mutation screening strategy.
PURPOSE:Protocadherin-15 (PCDH15) is one of the five genes currently identified as being mutated in Usher 1 syndrome and defines Usher syndrome type 1F (USH1F). When PCDH15 was systematically analyzed for mutations in a cohort of USH1 patients, a number of deletions were found. Here we characterize these deletions as to extent, position, and breakpoints. METHODS: Microsatellite and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analyses, used in a preliminary survey of an Usher cohort of 31 patients, revealed large deletions in three patients. These deletions were further characterized by semiquantitative PCR assays to narrow down the breakpoints. RESULTS: The analysis of the three large deletions revealed that all six breakpoints are different. The breakpoint junction was identified in one patient and the four other breakpoints were mapped to 4 kb. There were no specific distinguishing features of the isolated breakpoints. CONCLUSIONS: A complete screen of PCDH15 should include a search for large deletions. Failure to screen for gross genomic rearrangements is likely to significantly lower the mutation detection rate. A likely explanation for the high rate of such deletions is the unusual gene structure. PCDH15 gene spans nearly 1 Mb for a corresponding open reading frame (ORF) of 7,021 bp. The intron sizes of PCDH15 are up to 150 kb, and the first three exons of the gene cover 0.42 Mb. The genomic structure of any gene should be taken into consideration when designing a mutation screening strategy.
Authors: C Dehainault; A Laugé; V Caux-Moncoutier; S Pagès-Berhouet; F Doz; L Desjardins; J Couturier; M Gauthier-Villars; D Stoppa-Lyonnet; C Houdayer Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2004-10-11 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: K N Alagramam; H Yuan; M H Kuehn; C L Murcia; S Wayne; C R Srisailpathy; R B Lowry; R Knaus; L Van Laer; F P Bernier; S Schwartz; C Lee; C C Morton; R F Mullins; A Ramesh; G Van Camp; G S Hageman; R P Woychik; R J Smith; G S Hagemen Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2001-08-01 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: A-F Roux; V Faugère; S Le Guédard; N Pallares-Ruiz; A Vielle; S Chambert; S Marlin; C Hamel; B Gilbert; S Malcolm; M Claustres Journal: J Med Genet Date: 2006-05-05 Impact factor: 6.318
Authors: R J Smith; C I Berlin; J F Hejtmancik; B J Keats; W J Kimberling; R A Lewis; C G Möller; M Z Pelias; L Tranebjaerg Journal: Am J Med Genet Date: 1994-03-01
Authors: Zubair M Ahmed; Saima Riazuddin; Jamil Ahmad; Steve L Bernstein; Yan Guo; Muhammad F Sabar; Paul Sieving; Sheikh Riazuddin; Andrew J Griffith; Thomas B Friedman; Inna A Belyantseva; Edward R Wilcox Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2003-10-21 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Stuart W Webb; Nicolas Grillet; Leonardo R Andrade; Wei Xiong; Lani Swarthout; Charley C Della Santina; Bechara Kachar; Ulrich Müller Journal: Development Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 6.868
Authors: Lance Doucette; Nancy D Merner; Sandra Cooke; Elizabeth Ives; Dante Galutira; Vanessa Walsh; Tom Walsh; Linda MacLaren; Tracey Cater; Bridget Fernandez; Jane S Green; Edward R Wilcox; Lawrence I Shotland; Larry Shotland; Xiaoyan Cindy Li; X C Li; Ming Lee; Mary-Claire King; Terry-Lynn Young Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2008-12-24 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: María José Aparisi; Gema García-García; Teresa Jaijo; Regina Rodrigo; Claudio Graziano; Marco Seri; Tulay Simsek; Enver Simsek; Sara Bernal; Montserrat Baiget; Herminio Pérez-Garrigues; Elena Aller; José María Millán Journal: Mol Vis Date: 2010-12-31 Impact factor: 2.367