Literature DB >> 17277650

The influence of patients' and primary care practitioners' beliefs and expectations about chronic musculoskeletal pain on the process of care: a systematic review of qualitative studies.

Suzanne Parsons1, Geoffrey Harding, Alan Breen, Nadine Foster, Tamar Pincus, Steve Vogel, Martin Underwood.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To review qualitative, empirical studies exploring the influence of patients' and primary care practitioners' beliefs and expectations on the process of care for chronic musculoskeletal pain.
METHODS: A multidisciplinary review group searched 9 bibliographic databases. The group worked in pairs to screen titles and abstracts for relevance, to quality appraise relevant studies, to extract data from high-quality studies and to undertake a thematic analysis of this data.
RESULTS: We identified 12,994 abstracts from our searches, of which we obtained 113 full-text articles as their abstracts contained insufficient information for us to decide on their eligibility. We appraised 22 qualitative studies, 15 of which were included in the analysis. Themes identified included; (1) beliefs about pain, (2) expectations of treatment, (3) trust, and (4) patient education. Both patients and practitioners wanted clear communication within the consultation and to be respected, but conflicts existed on nearly all other aspects of the consultation, some of which at present may seem insurmountable and may lead to difficulties in achieving positive outcomes. DISCUSSION: To tackle the challenges and conflicts identified within the review, change may have to occur, not just in individual patient and practitioner beliefs and behavior, but also at an organizational and system level, for example, changes in undergraduate and postgraduate education and changes in the organization and availability of health services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17277650     DOI: 10.1097/01.ajp.0000210947.34676.34

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Pain        ISSN: 0749-8047            Impact factor:   3.442


  31 in total

Review 1.  Back Schools for chronic non-specific low back pain.

Authors:  Patrícia Parreira; Martijn W Heymans; Maurits W van Tulder; Rosmin Esmail; Bart W Koes; Nolwenn Poquet; Chung-Wei Christine Lin; Christopher G Maher
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-08-03

2.  Individual recovery expectations and prognosis of outcomes in non-specific low back pain: prognostic factor review.

Authors:  Jill A Hayden; Maria N Wilson; Richard D Riley; Ross Iles; Tamar Pincus; Rachel Ogilvie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-11-25

3.  [Risk minimization in pain therapy: important target but how can it be reached?].

Authors:  G-G Hanekop; F B M Ensink
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.107

4.  Psychometric properties and factor structure of the Spanish version of the HC-PAIRS questionnaire.

Authors:  Julio Domenech; Eva Segura-Ortí; Juan Francisco Lisón; Begoña Espejo-Tort; Daniel Sánchez-Zuriaga
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Met or matched expectations: what accounts for a successful back pain consultation in primary care?

Authors:  Ehab E Georgy; Eloise C J Carr; Alan C Breen
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Qualitative systematic reviews: their importance for our understanding of research relevant to pain.

Authors:  Kate Seers
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2015-02

7.  Clinician-patient agreement about the work disability problem of patients having persistent pain: why it matters.

Authors:  Marie-France Coutu; Raymond Baril; Marie-José Durand; Daniel Côté; Geneviève Cadieux
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2013-03

8.  The relationship between patient and practitioner expectations and preferences and clinical outcomes in a trial of exercise and acupuncture for knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Nadine E Foster; Elaine Thomas; Jonathan C Hill; Elaine M Hay
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 3.931

9.  British pain clinic practitioners' recognition and use of the bio-psychosocial pain management model for patients when physical interventions are ineffective or inappropriate: results of a qualitative study.

Authors:  Geoffrey Harding; John Campbell; Suzanne Parsons; Anisur Rahman; Martin Underwood
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Low Back Imaging When Not Indicated: A Descriptive Cross-System Analysis.

Authors:  Rachel Gold; Elizabeth Esterberg; Celine Hollombe; Jill Arkind; Patricia A Vakarcs; Huong Tran; Tim Burdick; Jennifer E Devoe; Michael A Horberg
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2016-02-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.