PURPOSE: Beta-blockade (BB) has been shown to improve outcomes among patients with heart failure (HF). The impact this pharmacological approach has on the prognostic information gained from cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) is, however, unclear. METHODS: Four hundred seventeen subjects diagnosed with HF underwent CPX. The numbers of subjects prescribed and not prescribed a BB agent were 167 and 250, respectively. Subjects were tracked for cardiac-related mortality after CPX. RESULTS: Values are reported for the no-BB versus the BB group throughout. Age (57.9 +/- 13.3 vs 55.6 +/- 12.5), peak VO2 (16.2 +/- 5.7 vs 16.5 +/- 5.5 mL x kg(-1) x min(-1)), VE/VCO2 slope (34.2 +/- 9.0 vs 33.2 +/- 7.4), and peak RER (1.07 +/- 0.16 vs 1.05 +/- 0.14) were similar between groups (P > 0.05). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that the VE/VCO2 slope was the superior predictor of death in both groups (chi-square: 71.9, P < 0.001; and 18.4, P < 0.001). The optimal threshold values for VE/VCO2 slope in the no-BB and BB groups were 36.0 and 34.3, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study indicate that BB does not alter the prognostic value/characteristics of the VE/VCO2 slope. Findings from previous investigations examining the prognostic significance of CPX predominantly using HF groups not receiving a BB agent may, therefore, still be applicable in modern-day clinical practice.
PURPOSE: Beta-blockade (BB) has been shown to improve outcomes among patients with heart failure (HF). The impact this pharmacological approach has on the prognostic information gained from cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) is, however, unclear. METHODS: Four hundred seventeen subjects diagnosed with HF underwent CPX. The numbers of subjects prescribed and not prescribed a BB agent were 167 and 250, respectively. Subjects were tracked for cardiac-related mortality after CPX. RESULTS: Values are reported for the no-BB versus the BB group throughout. Age (57.9 +/- 13.3 vs 55.6 +/- 12.5), peak VO2 (16.2 +/- 5.7 vs 16.5 +/- 5.5 mL x kg(-1) x min(-1)), VE/VCO2 slope (34.2 +/- 9.0 vs 33.2 +/- 7.4), and peak RER (1.07 +/- 0.16 vs 1.05 +/- 0.14) were similar between groups (P > 0.05). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that the VE/VCO2 slope was the superior predictor of death in both groups (chi-square: 71.9, P < 0.001; and 18.4, P < 0.001). The optimal threshold values for VE/VCO2 slope in the no-BB and BB groups were 36.0 and 34.3, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study indicate that BB does not alter the prognostic value/characteristics of the VE/VCO2 slope. Findings from previous investigations examining the prognostic significance of CPX predominantly using HF groups not receiving a BB agent may, therefore, still be applicable in modern-day clinical practice.
Authors: Ross Arena; Jonathan Myers; Joshua Abella; Sherry Pinkstaff; Peter Brubaker; Dalane W Kitzman; Mary Ann Peberdy; Daniel Bensimhon; Paul Chase; Marco Guazzi Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2010-06-30 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Ross Arena; Marco Guazzi; Jonathan Myers; Paul Chase; Daniel Bensimhon; Lawrence P Cahalin; Mary Ann Peberdy; Euan Ashley; Erin West; Daniel E Forman Journal: J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev Date: 2012 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.081
Authors: Marco Guazzi; Barry Borlaug; Marco Metra; Maurizio Losito; Francesco Bandera; Eleonora Alfonzetti; Sara Boveri; Tadafumi Sugimoto Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2021-02-20 Impact factor: 5.501