Literature DB >> 17277575

Three-dimensional distribution of the electric field induced in the brain by transcranial magnetic stimulation using figure-8 and deep H-coils.

Yiftach Roth1, Alon Amir, Yechiel Levkovitz, Abraham Zangen.   

Abstract

The H-coils are a novel development in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), designed to achieve effective stimulation of deep neuronal regions without inducing unbearable fields cortically, thus broadly expanding the potential feasibility of TMS for research and for treating various neurologic disorders. This study compared the field distribution of two H-coil versions, termed H1 and H2, and of a standard figure-of-eight coil. Three-dimensional electrical field distributions of the H1 and H2-coils, designed for effective stimulation of prefrontal regions, and of a standard figure-8 coil, were measured in a head model filled with physiologic saline solution. With stimulator output at 120% of the hand motor threshold, suprathreshold field is induced by the H1-coil at lateral and medial frontal regions at depths of up to 4 to 5 cm, and by the H2-coil at medial prefrontal regions up to 2 to 3 cm, and at lateral frontal regions up to 5 to 6 cm. The figure-8 coil induced suprathreshold field focally under the coil's central segment, at depths of up to 1.5 cm. The ability of the H-coils to stimulate effectively deeper neuronal structures is obtained at the cost of a wider electrical field distribution in the brain. However, the H-coils enable simultaneous stimulation of several brain regions, whereas the depth penetration in each region can be controlled either by adjusting the stimulator output, and/or by varying the distance between various coil elements and the skull.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17277575     DOI: 10.1097/WNP.0b013e31802fa393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0736-0258            Impact factor:   2.177


  80 in total

1.  Treatment of Bipolar Depression with Deep TMS: Results from a Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel Group, Sham-Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Diego F Tavares; Martin L Myczkowski; Rodrigo L Alberto; Leandro Valiengo; Rosa M Rios; Pedro Gordon; Bernardo de Sampaio-Junior; Izio Klein; Carlos G Mansur; Marco Antonio Marcolin; Beny Lafer; Ricardo A Moreno; Wagner Gattaz; Zafiris J Daskalakis; André R Brunoni
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 7.853

2.  Important methodological issues regarding the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation to investigate interoceptive processing: a Comment on Pollatos et al. (2016).

Authors:  Michel-Pierre Coll; Tegan Penton; Hannah Hobson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Deep magnetic stimulation in a progressive supranuclear palsy patient with speech involvement.

Authors:  Francesca Spagnolo; Elisabetta Coppi; Pasquale Anthony Della Rosa; Mario Fichera; Alessandra Barbieri; Giuseppe Magnani; Monica Falautano; Abraham Zangen; Giancarlo Comi; Daniela Perani; Maria Antonietta Volontè; Letizia Leocani
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2012-12-02       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Efficacy, tolerability, and cognitive effects of deep transcranial magnetic stimulation for late-life depression: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Tyler S Kaster; Zafiris J Daskalakis; Yoshihiro Noda; Yuliya Knyahnytska; Jonathan Downar; Tarek K Rajji; Yechiel Levkovitz; Abraham Zangen; Meryl A Butters; Benoit H Mulsant; Daniel M Blumberger
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 5.  Brain Stimulation in Addiction.

Authors:  Michael C Salling; Diana Martinez
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 7.853

6.  Coil design considerations for deep transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Zhi-De Deng; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Alleviation of ADHD symptoms by non-invasive right prefrontal stimulation is correlated with EEG activity.

Authors:  Uri Alyagon; Hamutal Shahar; Aviad Hadar; Noam Barnea-Ygael; Avi Lazarovits; Hadar Shalev; Abraham Zangen
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 4.881

Review 8.  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research.

Authors:  Simone Rossi; Mark Hallett; Paolo M Rossini; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Seizure Induced by Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in an Adolescent with Depression.

Authors:  Kathryn R Cullen; Suzanne Jasberg; Brent Nelson; Bonnie Klimes-Dougan; Kelvin O Lim; Paul E Croarkin
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 2.576

10.  Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on parietal and premotor cortex during planning of reaching movements.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Busan; Claudia Barbera; Mauro Semenic; Fabrizio Monti; Gilberto Pizzolato; Giovanna Pelamatti; Piero Paolo Battaglini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.