OBJECTIVE: To describe the implementation of the European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) model as a quality framework for improving a psychiatric hospital ward. METHODOGY: Two self-assessments were conducted using the EFQM model. The self-assessment methods combined two approaches proposed by the EFQM: the award simulation approach and the questionnaire approach. Work groups were set up to improve the areas for improvement identified on the self-assessment. RESULTS: The EFQM was a useful framework for self-assessment at the ward level and a good system for identifying areas for improvement. Only one of the 32 sub-criteria did not apply at the ward level. The self-assessment score was 209 points in 2003 and 311 points 2 years later (an increase of 48.8% from the initial score). DISCUSSION: The main difficulties were ensuring that clinical personnel understood the EFQM model, the extra effort demanded by the initial phase and the lack of decision-making capacity in certain relevant areas. Adapting the self-assessment methodology to the specific context facilitated the process, as did a high level of involvement of the part of manager and staff. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to implement the EFQM model at the hospital was level and it has a positive influence on staff communication and involvement. It is important, when working at this level, to adequately focus the scope of the project on improving quality in those areas where there is decision-making capacity.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the implementation of the European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) model as a quality framework for improving a psychiatric hospital ward. METHODOGY: Two self-assessments were conducted using the EFQM model. The self-assessment methods combined two approaches proposed by the EFQM: the award simulation approach and the questionnaire approach. Work groups were set up to improve the areas for improvement identified on the self-assessment. RESULTS: The EFQM was a useful framework for self-assessment at the ward level and a good system for identifying areas for improvement. Only one of the 32 sub-criteria did not apply at the ward level. The self-assessment score was 209 points in 2003 and 311 points 2 years later (an increase of 48.8% from the initial score). DISCUSSION: The main difficulties were ensuring that clinical personnel understood the EFQM model, the extra effort demanded by the initial phase and the lack of decision-making capacity in certain relevant areas. Adapting the self-assessment methodology to the specific context facilitated the process, as did a high level of involvement of the part of manager and staff. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to implement the EFQM model at the hospital was level and it has a positive influence on staff communication and involvement. It is important, when working at this level, to adequately focus the scope of the project on improving quality in those areas where there is decision-making capacity.
Authors: Mohammad Hasan Imani Nasab; Bahram Mohaghegh; Nader Khalesi; Ebrahim Jaafaripooyan Journal: Iran J Public Health Date: 2013-06-01 Impact factor: 1.429