Literature DB >> 17276976

Modeling human papillomavirus vaccine effectiveness: quantifying the impact of parameter uncertainty.

Nicolas Van de Velde1, Marc Brisson, Marie-Claude Boily.   

Abstract

The development of models is based on assumptions, which inevitably embed a level of uncertainty. Quantifying such uncertainty is particularly important when modeling human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine effectiveness; the natural history of infection and disease is complex, and age- and type-specific data remain scarce and incomplete. The aim of this study was to predict the impact of HPV-6/11/16/18 vaccination, using a cohort model and measuring parameter uncertainty. An extensive fitting procedure was conducted, which identified 164 posterior parameter combinations (out of 200,000 prior parameter sets) that fit simultaneously HPV type-specific incidence and prevalence data for infection, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Results based on these posterior parameter sets suggest that vaccinating girls aged 12 years (vaccine efficacy = 95%, no waning) would reduce their lifetime risk of HPV infection, CIN1, CIN2/3, and SCC by 21% (80% credibility interval: 17, 29), 24% (80% credibility interval: 17, 31), 49% (80% credibility interval: 36, 60), and 61% (80% credibility interval: 47, 73), respectively. If vaccine efficacy is reduced or vaccine protection is assumed to wane, uncertainty surrounding predictions widens considerably. Important priorities for future research are to understand the role of natural immunity and to measure the duration of vaccine protection because results were most sensitive to these parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17276976     DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwk059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  39 in total

1.  Incorporating calibrated model parameters into sensitivity analyses: deterministic and probabilistic approaches.

Authors:  Douglas C A Taylor; Vivek Pawar; Denise T Kruzikas; Kristen E Gilmore; Myrlene Sanon; Milton C Weinstein
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Calibrating models in economic evaluation: a seven-step approach.

Authors:  Tazio Vanni; Jonathan Karnon; Jason Madan; Richard G White; W John Edmunds; Anna M Foss; Rosa Legood
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Methods of model calibration: observations from a mathematical model of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Douglas C A Taylor; Vivek Pawar; Denise Kruzikas; Kristen E Gilmore; Ankur Pandya; Rowan Iskandar; Milton C Weinstein
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Circumcision for all: the pro side.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Houle
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Gardasil® - The New HPV Vaccine: The Right Product, the Right Time? A Commentary.

Authors:  Joel Lexchin; Neil Arya; Sonal Singh
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2010-05

6.  Seven challenges for model-driven data collection in experimental and observational studies.

Authors:  J Lessler; W J Edmunds; M E Halloran; T D Hollingsworth; A L Lloyd
Journal:  Epidemics       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 7.  Economic and humanistic burden of external genital warts.

Authors:  Adam J N Raymakers; Mohsen Sadatsafavi; Fawziah Marra; Carlo A Marra
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Cost-effectiveness of high-risk human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening in Québec, Canada.

Authors:  Arthi Vijayaraghavan; Molly B Efrusy; Marie-Hélêne Mayrand; Christopher C Santas; Patricia Goggin
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2010 May-Jun

9.  Using the Cancer Risk Management Model to evaluate the health and economic impacts of cytology compared with human papillomavirus DNA testing for primary cervical cancer screening in Canada.

Authors:  C Popadiuk; C L Gauvreau; M Bhavsar; C Nadeau; K Asakawa; W M Flanagan; M C Wolfson; A J Coldman; S Memon; N Fitzgerald; J Lacombe; A B Miller
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.677

10.  Current crisis or artifact of surveillance: insights into rebound chlamydia rates from dynamic modelling.

Authors:  David M Vickers; Nathaniel D Osgood
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.090

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.