OBJECTIVE: To determine if presence of the Roach muscle, a small muscle bundle lying just beside the umbilical artery, contributes to umbilical cord coiling. METHODS: 251 umbilical cords were examined. The umbilical coiling index (UCI) was calculated as the number of coils divided by the cord length in cm. Cords were classified as hypocoiled (UCI<p10), normocoiled (UCI p10-p90) or hypercoiled (UCI>p90). On microscopic examination of a cross section of the cord, absence or presence of a Roach muscle was determined. The t-test for independent samples and logistic regression were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A Roach muscle was observed in 101 cords. The mean UCI was higher in cords with the muscle bundle (0.23 coils/cm) than in cords without a muscle (0.18 coils/cm). Difference in mean: 0.05 coils/cm (95% C.I. 0.01-0.09). OR for hypercoiling in presence of the muscle was 2.98 (95% C.I. 1.57-5.64). OR for hypocoiling in the presence of the muscle was 1.49 (95% C.I. 0.79-2.81). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that presence of a Roach muscle bundle contributes to umbilical cord coiling. Given the divergence in umbilical cord coiling within subgroups with or without this muscle, other factors must play a more dominant role.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if presence of the Roach muscle, a small muscle bundle lying just beside the umbilical artery, contributes to umbilical cord coiling. METHODS: 251 umbilical cords were examined. The umbilical coiling index (UCI) was calculated as the number of coils divided by the cord length in cm. Cords were classified as hypocoiled (UCI<p10), normocoiled (UCI p10-p90) or hypercoiled (UCI>p90). On microscopic examination of a cross section of the cord, absence or presence of a Roach muscle was determined. The t-test for independent samples and logistic regression were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A Roach muscle was observed in 101 cords. The mean UCI was higher in cords with the muscle bundle (0.23 coils/cm) than in cords without a muscle (0.18 coils/cm). Difference in mean: 0.05 coils/cm (95% C.I. 0.01-0.09). OR for hypercoiling in presence of the muscle was 2.98 (95% C.I. 1.57-5.64). OR for hypocoiling in the presence of the muscle was 1.49 (95% C.I. 0.79-2.81). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that presence of a Roach muscle bundle contributes to umbilical cord coiling. Given the divergence in umbilical cord coiling within subgroups with or without this muscle, other factors must play a more dominant role.