Literature DB >> 17275698

High-resolution myocardial perfusion imaging in mice with high-frequency echocardiographic detection of a depot contrast agent.

Beat A Kaufmann1, Miles Lankford, Carolyn Z Behm, Brent A French, Alexander L Klibanov, Yaqin Xu, Jonathan R Lindner.   

Abstract

High-resolution methods for assessing myocardial perfusion in murine models of cardiovascular disease are needed. We hypothesized that regional hypoperfusion could be assessed with ultrahigh-frequency myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) and a novel strategy of depot contrast enhancement. MCE was performed with 30-MHz transthoracic imaging 10 seconds and 10 minutes after intravenous administration of microbubbles in control mice, and in mice after left anterior descending coronary artery ligation. MCE was also performed using size-segregated microbubbles. Microbubble behavior in the microcirculation was evaluated with intravital microscopy. In control mice anterior myocardial enhancement was robust at 10 seconds, but left ventricular cavity attenuation precluded evaluation of posterior segments. After 10 minutes, left ventricular cavity signal cleared but myocardial enhancement persisted, permitting analysis of all segments. The degree of enhancement at 10 min was related to microbubble size, implying retention of large microbubbles transiting pulmonary arteriovenous shunts. Intravital microscopy confirmed capillary lodging of large microbubbles. Infarct size by delayed MCE correlated with fluorescent nanospheres (r = 0.94, P < .001). We conclude that complete assessment of regional myocardial perfusion in the mouse heart is possible with high-frequency MCE and a single intravenous contrast agent injection. This technique can be used for characterizing murine models of myocardial infarction and left ventricular remodeling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17275698     DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2006.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr        ISSN: 0894-7317            Impact factor:   5.251


  11 in total

Review 1.  Preclinical imaging: an essential ally in modern biosciences.

Authors:  Lídia Cunha; Ildiko Horvath; Sara Ferreira; Joana Lemos; Pedro Costa; Domingos Vieira; Dániel S Veres; Krisztián Szigeti; Teresa Summavielle; Domokos Máthé; Luís F Metello
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.074

2.  Micro-ultrasound for preclinical imaging.

Authors:  F Stuart Foster; John Hossack; S Lee Adamson
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 3.906

3.  A novel method for quantitative myocardial contrast echocardiography in mice.

Authors:  E Alvarez; N D Dalton; Y Gu; D Smith; A Luong; M Hoshijima; K L Peterson; J Rychak
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 4.733

4.  Echocardiography in Mice.

Authors:  Shumin Gao; David Ho; Dorothy E Vatner; Stephen F Vatner
Journal:  Curr Protoc Mouse Biol       Date:  2011-03-01

5.  Phase-Conversion Nanoparticle Contrast Agents: Do Good Things Come in Small Packages?

Authors:  Jonathan R Lindner
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 7.792

6.  Requisite Role of Kv1.5 Channels in Coronary Metabolic Dilation.

Authors:  Vahagn Ohanyan; Liya Yin; Raffi Bardakjian; Christopher Kolz; Molly Enrick; Tatevik Hakobyan; John Kmetz; Ian Bratz; Jordan Luli; Masaki Nagane; Nadeem Khan; Huagang Hou; Periannan Kuppusamy; Jacqueline Graham; Frances Kwan Fu; Danielle Janota; Moses O Oyewumi; Suzanna Logan; Jonathan R Lindner; William M Chilian
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 17.367

7.  Cardiomyocyte PDGFR-beta signaling is an essential component of the mouse cardiac response to load-induced stress.

Authors:  Vishnu Chintalgattu; Di Ai; Robert R Langley; Jianhu Zhang; James A Bankson; Tiffany L Shih; Anilkumar K Reddy; Kevin R Coombes; Iyad N Daher; Shibani Pati; Shalin S Patel; Jennifer S Pocius; George E Taffet; L Maximillian Buja; Mark L Entman; Aarif Y Khakoo
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Renal retention of lipid microbubbles: a potential mechanism for flank discomfort during ultrasound contrast administration.

Authors:  Ya Ni Liu; Jaspreet Khangura; Aris Xie; J Todd Belcik; Yue Qi; Brian P Davidson; Yan Zhao; Sajeevani Kim; Yoichi Inaba; Jonathan R Lindner
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 5.251

9.  A comparison of the imaging performance of high resolution ultrasound scanners for preclinical imaging.

Authors:  Carmel M Moran; Stephen D Pye; William Ellis; Anna Janeczko; Keith D Morris; Alan S McNeilly; Hamish M Fraser
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Myocardial contrast echocardiography assessment of mouse myocardial infarction: comparison of kinetic parameters with conventional methods.

Authors:  Nicholas T Thielen; Adison A Kleinsasser; Jessica L Freeling
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.